This person's 599 annotations
(page 24)
This is something for the New South Wales police. It has nothing with the Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity. The applicant should go...
The applicant has not made any kind of request under the Freedom of Information Act. The letter to the Australian Electoral Commission is, in reality,...
The request is not a Commonwealth FOI matter. It is for the law and parliamentary action in Victoria. Hansard for Victoria is on http://www.parliament....
I was wrong in my comment. I apologize. I misread section 15AC.
Mea culpa.
This seems to be a good result for the applicant. For Right to Know it cannot be a best result.
The applicant has received the documents. But where ar...
No power to extend time as requested.
You asked, "How many times can you do this?" It is better to ask, "How long can you do this?"
Some facts: You...
Problems arise from excessive attempts at preceision in the specification of a document; e.g., here the excess has resulted in the request to be incons...
It is very much a good result, completely contrary to my prediction. It reflects extremely well on the staff of the Department of the House of Represen...
This annotation is only to make assistance for any other user.
The foundation of the application is a basic misunderstanding of Chapter I, Part I, se...
It is maybe worthwhile to thank the Attorney-General's Department for the information but also to tell them it does not change your application.
It w...
I make this comment to be sure that for you the FOI time line does not go wrong. Also, if you already know this, maybe it will be useful for some other...
The response of the Department of Immigration was completely predictable. More wise was to make different words in the applications. But now for someth...
I make comments the same as my comments elsewhere (http://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/the_ehealth_mou_which_replaced_t#comment-130).You should reque...
English! Always it is difficult. But one does not "gratefully request". To be grateful is to be thankful, and the time for gratitude is after your requ...
For other users, I think it is worthwhile to explain in more detail what has happened here and also because the responsible person, Ms Mirijana Soldati...
You maybe do not want to go any further with your application and maybe you are happy with the information: "There is no document that meets the terms...
Paul. You appear to have a good sense of how this site works, so perhaps you can help others in your cause. I sent a message earlier today to three peo...
I have a request. I searched Google, Bing, Yahoo, Ixquick and DuckDuckGo but I did not get any result for "1-6F45B9". So how can it be that you know th...
Unfortunately your letter is not a request for information under the Freedom of Information Act. So, no matter how interesting your questions are, ther...
You are likely aware of the following ideas but some other users maybe not.
First, the decision in 'T' and Australian Securities and Investments Comm...
It is interesting to compare Chapter I, Part I, section 1 of the Constitution with some other Imperial Act, for example the Oxford University Act of 18...
The questions you have asked the department ares very interesting and it would be good to know the answer to them. But the clock is running and you are...
I think your request is based on incorrect belief. It sounds as if you believe that the Constitution given the parliament an official name and that it...
Your request is probably to be refused because it is not very clear what documents you are want.
The biggest problem is to ask for "a list of every...