This person's 599 annotations
(page 23)
A few things of note, in no particular order.
The decision maker was correct to refuse the request but the refusal is not based on a valid reason. Al...
Some history: The British claim of sovereignty over territory is traditionally effected by a person (usually a person authorized by the Crown) claiming...
This looks like a wrong, and silly, decision. It looks as if it should be obvious to the decision maker that it is a wrong decision. The decision maker...
Because I am curious, I look to see who is Matthew Landauer, and I discover that I should have asked this question before I wrote my annotation. Matthe...
I can make two suggestions.
I guess that you hope that there is something hidden in the electronic document to tell you something. I also imagine tha...
I think that this is a very fascinating requests for two reasons. Reason one is only the content of the archive; that is naturally the reason for the r...
It is not very obvious to a Right to Know user, but this request was answered by the Australian Electoral Commission in another email thread. The lette...
This is a very interesting question and it will be of interest to see what is the response from the Australian Electoral Commission. I think one must e...
For the reasons explained in another annotation (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/who_owns_the_right_to_vote#comment-330) this request must be re...
For the reasons explained in another annotation (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/who_owns_the_right_to_vote#comment-330) this request must be re...
For the reasons explained in another annotation (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/who_owns_the_right_to_vote#comment-330) this request must be re...
I write because I hope you will accept my advice and my suggestions. Maybe an annotation is not the best place but I have a try anyway.
You have made...
If you combine what Mr Grant Moodie has said and the section 5 of the Corporations Act, you can obtain the following.
The Commonwealth is not a corpo...
The decision maker has been very kind to give more explanation and not only to say, "No, the document does not exist".
You might ask why he says, "th...
I apologise if you thought I meant to say that your application was not in good faith. When people have a difficult time to learn about their governmen...
Please can you tell me what the file is about. It is perhaps of interest to other people also using Right to Know. Also, I am interested to know where...
I wish to make a comment and a suggestion. The request you have made will be refused. The Department will tell you that there is a "practical refusal r...
This request and the other emails look similar to some other requests where an applicant seemed not to be trying to get a document but to be trying to...
If the following is already known to you, I apologise. Perhaps another user will find it to be useful. I try to annotate on the response of the Austral...
It looks as if this is intended to be a request for Internal Review. But, if it is a request for Internal Review, it is helpful to the agency (and to y...
Mr Garrett, thank you. I am not so sure how much I should answer. My answer (and also your comment) would be better to appear on a blog than to be here...
I write this annotation because I do not think that you will get the answer from Attorney-General's Department. Mr Grey tried to make a request like th...
It was predictable.
It is worthwhile to read the Commonwealth Authorities and Companies Act 1997 (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/c...
Writer's most recent email says a "detailed reply and response to this request is outstanding". That is simply true; there is yet no reply. But the AEC...
The request must be refused but to get the information is easy. Section 12(1)(b) of the FOI Act (http://www.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/cth/consol_act/foia...