This person's 599 annotations
(page 21)
In the current form of the request it will be refused, almost with certainty. If it is not refused, it will be said that in the current form it is inva...
A handful of requests to the Australian Broadcasting Commission have been made since only a short time. Most of them will probably fail, this one inclu...
To say it at the beginning, in my mind it is most desirable that all agencies should make disclosed documents available for downloading from their webs...
Yes, I have ideas to inform but not, unfortunately, to help.
It is worthwhile to say that it is not unusual in western democracies for government depa...
It will not be a surprise if the Taxation Office must ask for a restriction of the range or scope of the request. The current manner of the address pro...
The applicant has been successful in his request and wishes to make more widely available the documents to which he has obtained access. He asks the ag...
I accidentally omitted something from my annotation.
Ms Lystich said in her email from 15 Jan, "this email is not a FOI request". That is correct. Th...
I have written already today about how the Right to Know website is used. This annotation is the second.
Ms Lystich mentions the purpose of the Right...
This application from Mr Sweeney is one of a series. Does it represent an honorable use of Right to Know? Do the other requests represent honourable us...
It is a very strange reply from the Deparment. The letter mentions 8489 officers in the Department but why is that number of relevance to request? It i...
The response from Janelle Raineri at the Department of Immigration is disgraceful. It brings the Department of Immigration and the Australian Public Se...
I have learnt to feel very hopeless with request to Department of Immigration and Border Protection but in this letter of refusal there is also a candl...
I think that there has been a misunderstanding or else something has been lost from the Right to Know website. There are remarks from the applicant for...
Always it is a pity that applicants do not take enough time to consider how to make their requests. Unfortunately, I think that it is the case with thi...
I did not see this request in 2013. Only now I have seen it because the annotation by Eli Sky made the request be visible at the top of the list.
Th...
Please have a look at my annotation on the request called "Gender balance of detainees from years 2000-2014" (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/g....
Please have a look at my annotation on the request called "Gender balance of detainees from years 2000-2014" (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/ge...
Please have a look at my annotation on the request called "Gender balance of detainees from years 2000-2014" (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/ge...
Please have a look at my annotation on the request called "Gender balance of detainees from years 2000-2014" (https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/ge...
This request will be refused. It is (almost without doubt) not a valid request under the Freedom of Information Act. It will only be a valid request if...
This request has many respects of similarity to at least two previous requests on Right to Know:
Parliament of the Commonwealth: (https://www.righttok...
Mr Harrison, may I please suggest that you send immediately to the Department of Defense an amended request. The request you have made will be initiall...
I think that there has been double misunderstandings here. I imagine that Medibank Private thought that the applicant was requesting personal informati...
In my mind, it is a high quality response from the internal review maker. He has read the review request. He has also read the extra information on thi...
Mr Cordove, this sounds like good news. So because I do not understand, I would be very pleased if you would say something more.
Do you mean that the...