Freedom of Information requests made by this person
This person has made no Freedom of Information requests using this site.
This person's 599 annotations
The request is not really refused ... it is deemed to be withdrawn by the applicant because the applicant did not reply to the correspondence within 30...
The applicant sent a request for information to the Australian Public Service Commission. The Commission decided not to deal with the request and sent...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and so the Right to Know system is now asking anyone to do the classification. That...
The agency deleted some information from the documents because the information was not relevant to the request.
The request is not really refused. It is deemed to be withdrawn by the applicant. This has happened because the applicant did not respond to an inquiry...
Not truly refused. Because the applicant did not respond to the consultation email from the authority, the request is taken to have been withdrawn by t...
To the applicant. My only reason for this note is to help you see the way that Right to Know shows different kinds of writing. A message from an applic...
The request was not taken to be valid under the FOI Act.
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
Some of the wanted information is not held by the authority. Other information held by the authority is available for a fee and is therefore not access...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
I have marked the request as "refused". The authority says in the last email that they will treat the request as "withdrawn". I cannot see any legal ba...
I have marked this as "refused". It is a deemed refusal because the authority did not give the applicant a notice of decision within the required time....
This request was actually withdrawn by the applicant and not refused by the authority. I sent a message to the applicant to ask them to update the stat...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
In a previous annotation I said that the applicant is not entitled to an internal review. This is true. But it is possible still for the authority to m...
The applicant has not marked the status of this request; I have been asked to do it. I have marked this request as "successful" but the applicant maybe...
This applicant has made a mistake. An annotation, like the one I made yesterday ( https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/is_the_following_included_in_t...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
The authority granted access to the documents. The authority said that they would publish the documents on their disclosure log. I have not checked tha...
Thgis is not actually a refused application. The applicant was told that he would have to pay a processing charge. The charges were not paid. The appli...
The last useful email from Charles Sturt University was this one https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/dentistry_admission_statistics_a
sent on 17 Ja...
The applicant has not told Right to Know the status of this request and I have been asked to update the status.
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response...
The request will almost certainly be rejected because (i) it is invalid as an application under the Freedom of Information Act 1983 (Cth) because it is...