This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 34)
(page 2)
The “not recording the number of requests” comment is not a good sign.
Yes, technically they don’t, but had I asked for copies of them that would hav...
This is one of the few times not having the information is acceptable :)
UNCLASSIFIED
Good afternoon
Freedom of Information Request – FOI 18/141
Thank you for your email to the Department of Finance (Finance), dated 31 De...
Dear Posty
As set out in the department's correspondence, dated 19 November 2018, the department published the document you were seeking on the Inform...
Yep that’s fine mate
Keep on truckin
Yours sincerely,
Posty
Mate.
that was a thankyou reply - even right to know is now confused that you replied to my request I withdrew, that i marked this successful, and...
Ok - just to keep things up to date - due to my information commissioner review request about this, this file was ongoing at OAIC because DHS refused t...
Dear Mr Adams
Please find attached correspondence in relation to your request for
Freedom of Information internal review (LEX 33696).
Rega...
The statement that 'The withdrawal of your request is a technical requirement of the FOI Act' is either false or incomplete (take your pick). There is...
This person's 75 annotations
(page 2)
This request is now overdue.
the first five hours of processing is meant to be free if I recall the FOI act correctly, thus no charge should have been rendered. maybe local council...
I consider requests for payment a refusal where it's clear that due to the length of time the requestor has left this dormant, no further action will g...
This is a very commendable response from the department given the original request.
The requestor failed to email reply clarifying the phone change of scope. - thus withdrawn, of which there is no status - therefore refused.
The dept would consider this withdrawn as the requestor did not reply in the timeframe, hence 'refused' is the only closest status.
'abandoned' would...
It's well past the extension request date
We're past the extension point
Good lord, leave the OAIC alone, they have enough to do. there's better answers in prior annotations.
I deem a charge of $340 an effective refusal where the requestor has not updated the request in a long time.
Looks like this application was thwarted by the $30 charge to even handle the request.
This information was provided under the different request - https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/covidsafe_installation_counts_or_2#incoming-17692
later that night I thought about it and I lodged an external review anyway, at the time I was curious as to *how* they planned to accomplish it.
As I...
Thanks for the comment - very polite.
my request was mainly about attempting service improvement that the department sorely lacked any interest in....
Hi,
If you're just coming to this request anew and wondering why my replies are a little colorful - I have been dealing with DHS for years now and ha...
Julia,
Not that there is much point in refusing your request for an extension of 30 days as per previous correspondence I am not going to be kicking...
Ok checking as of now the FOI disclosure log has up to page 3 with all of the documents
http://www.environment.gov.au/about-us/freedom-information/f...
I'm not doing a new request on this one because honestly it's like they ignored the request altogether and i missed that in the consultation period and...
i'm surprised you're reading this