Private use of social media advice provided to employees
Dear NT Department of Sport and Recreation,
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.
I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours faithfully,
James Smith
This is the mail system at host openaustralia.org.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.
For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.
If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.
The mail system
<[email address]>: host emdch-mx21.nt.gov.au[155.205.7.161] said: 550
5.1.1 <[email address]>: Recipient address rejected: user does not
exist in NTG Mail Core directory (in reply to RCPT TO command)
Sent request to NT Deptartment of Tourism and Culture again, using a new contact address.
Good afternoon
Further to your email below, sorry for the delay in responding to your email.
I notice your email is addressed to the Department of Sport and Recreation, however Sport and Recreation is a division within the Department of Tourism and Culture, therefore please clarify if your request is directed to a specific division or department. However, before further consideration can be given to your request, please provide a copy of your identification (usually a driver's licence) and your application fee of $30. The application fee is payable to the RTM.
Information on what identification is required to lodge a request can be found at the following link:
https://nt.gov.au/law/rights/freedom-of-...
Information on how to pay the application fee can be found at the following link:
https://nt.gov.au/law/rights/freedom-of-...
Please email the receipt from the RTM and your driver's licence to [NT Deptartment of Tourism and Culture request email].
Kind regards
Cathy
Cathy O’Brien
Manager Secretariat
Executive Services
Department of Tourism and Culture
Level 8, 19 The Mall
Charles Darwin Centre,
PO Box 1155 Darwin NT 0801
P…(08) 8999 4002
E…catherine.o’[email address]
Our Vision: Creating a public sector that provides the highest quality service to Territorians
Our Values: Commitment to Service | Ethical Practice | Respect | Accountability | Impartiality | Diversity
Disclaimer: The information contained in this message and any attachments may be confidential information and may be subject to legal privilege, public interest of legal profession privilege. Use or transmittal of the information in this email other than for authorised NT Government business purposes may constitute misconduct under the NT Public Sector Code of Conduct and could potentially be an offence under the NT Criminal Code. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of this message or any attachments is unauthorised. If you have received this document in error, please advise the sender. No representation of warranty is given that attached files are free from viruses or other defects. The recipient assumes all responsibility for any loss or damage resulting directly or indirectly from the use of any attached files.
-----Original Message-----
From: James Smith [mailto:[FOI #3952 email]]
Sent: Wednesday, 11 October 2017 6:58 PM
To: DTC FOI
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Private use of social media advice provided to employees
Dear NT Department of Sport and Recreation,
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.
I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours faithfully,
James Smith
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #3952 email]
Is [NT Deptartment of Tourism and Culture request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to NT Deptartment of Tourism and Culture? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Locutus Sum left an annotation ()
Note 1: Mostly I classify a response like this one to say "clarification requested" because the agency has told the applicant that some more information (or money!) is needed before the request will be processed. This time, I have put the response in the category of "refused" because it is more than 1 year since the agency responded and the applicant has not made a follow-up. This does not mean that the agency will refuse the request when an application is made in the correct (required).
Note 2: Although an application under the Freedom of Information Act 1983 of the Commonwealth of Australia does not require an application fee, this is not the case with applications in the states and territories of Australia. Then an applicant must usually pay a fee, or the request is not valid.
Note 2: It can be a problem when an applicant sends out a very large bulk request. Although it is convenient for the applicant, very often the application will not be valid. This is usually the fact when an applicant uses Right to Know to apply to an agency of a state or territory; see Note 2. When so many responses are received it is inconvenient to work out how to continue ... or even to classify the responses and often an applicant does not classify the responses so they create a backlog of unclassified responses on Right to Know.