ME/CFS- Information on how to ensure patient safety and quality.
Dear Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care,
Background - for clarity
In 2019 the NHMRC report on ME/CFS recognised the need to replace the 2002 RACP guidelines for CFS, To date little progress has been made and the NHMRC advises that will issue guidelines for people with ME/CFS (a severely impaired subset of people with CFS) but that these guidelines may not be issued for another 2-3 years.
At the moment due to the lack of specific guidelines for ME/CFS, the RACP 2002 guidelines for CFS are being used which is causing harm to people severely affected by ME/CFS (as per repeated worldwide patient surveys).
The 2002 RACP guidelines promote the use of Graded Exercise Therapy (GET sometimes called incremental physical activity) and a rehabilitative view of ME/CFS.
The use of GET and CBT as a treatment for ME/CFS has been found to be unsafe by the UK NICE researchers and the USA Centre for Disease Control (IOM report) , the Mayo Clinic, the International Consensus Criteria (ICC) Australian researchers contributed, biomedical researchers at Griffith University, the Melbourne OMF etc..
The findings of the UK, USA. ICC contributors, exercise physiologists (measuring disability in people with ME/CFS - Workwell Foundation) and Australian biomedical researchers are consistent with each other. All reject the use of GET and CBT as a "treatment" for ME/CFS and warn of the harm of over exertion/exercise.
Information Requested
1/ I am seeking correspondence, information on what your department does/has done to ensure the safety and quality of care for people with ME/CFS until the NHMRC issues the proposed new guidelines.
2/ If you have no information specific to ME/CFS then I request a copy of the policies and practices relating to what your department recommends to ensure the safety and quality of care for people who have disabilities/medical conditions for which Australia lacks up to date guidelines .e.g. do you have a policy on the adoption of the NICE Guidelines as an interim measure?
Yours faithfully,
Julie Keys
Dear Julie,
Thank you for the below request. I am writing to confirm receipt of your email.
I am one of the FOI Officers at the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care - we are currently reviewing our records and will get back to you.
Kind regards,
Tatiana Thurgood
Secretariat Support Officer
Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care
Level 5, 255 Elizabeth Street, Sydney NSW 2000
(02) 7232 5920 | www.safetyandquality.gov.au
[email address]
Work Days: Monday - Thursday
I acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of Australia and their continued connection to land, sea and community.
I pay my respects to Elders past, present and emerging.
-----Original Message-----
From: Julie Keys <[FOI #12312 email]>
Sent: Saturday, 9 November 2024 1:58 PM
To: SafetyandQualityFOI <[email address]>
Subject: TRIM: Freedom of Information request - ME/CFS- Information on how to ensure patient safety and quality.
REMINDER: Think before you click! This email originated from outside our organisation. Only click links or open attachments if you recognise the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care,
Background - for clarity
In 2019 the NHMRC report on ME/CFS recognised the need to replace the 2002 RACP guidelines for CFS, To date little progress has been made and the NHMRC advises that will issue guidelines for people with ME/CFS (a severely impaired subset of people with CFS) but that these guidelines may not be issued for another 2-3 years.
At the moment due to the lack of specific guidelines for ME/CFS, the RACP 2002 guidelines for CFS are being used which is causing harm to people severely affected by ME/CFS (as per repeated worldwide patient surveys).
The 2002 RACP guidelines promote the use of Graded Exercise Therapy (GET sometimes called incremental physical activity) and a rehabilitative view of ME/CFS.
The use of GET and CBT as a treatment for ME/CFS has been found to be unsafe by the UK NICE researchers and the USA Centre for Disease Control (IOM report) , the Mayo Clinic, the International Consensus Criteria (ICC) Australian researchers contributed, biomedical researchers at Griffith University, the Melbourne OMF etc..
The findings of the UK, USA. ICC contributors, exercise physiologists (measuring disability in people with ME/CFS - Workwell Foundation) and Australian biomedical researchers are consistent with each other. All reject the use of GET and CBT as a "treatment" for ME/CFS and warn of the harm of over exertion/exercise.
Information Requested
1/ I am seeking correspondence, information on what your department does/has done to ensure the safety and quality of care for people with ME/CFS until the NHMRC issues the proposed new guidelines.
2/ If you have no information specific to ME/CFS then I request a copy of the policies and practices relating to what your department recommends to ensure the safety and quality of care for people who have disabilities/medical conditions for which Australia lacks up to date guidelines .e.g. do you have a policy on the adoption of the NICE Guidelines as an interim measure?
Yours faithfully,
Julie Keys
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #12312 email]
Is [ACSQHC request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
The Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care acknowledges the traditional owners of country throughout Australia, and their continuing connection to land, sea and community. We pay our respects to them and their cultures, and to elders both past and present.
Important: This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error please notify the author immediately and delete all copies of this transmission.
"Important: This transmission is intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain confidential or legally privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you are notified that any use or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error please notify the author immediately and delete all copies of this transmission."