This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 109)
(page 2)
Dear Ms Pane,
Re: LEX 49105
I refer to your request for an internal review of LEX 47365.
Your request is in the following terms:
‘…I am wri...
Great FOI Verity.
Hard to believe Departmental expenditures rose from on average 7.5 million to almost tenfold (71 million on average) for contractor...
Dear Verity Pane,
Apologies, it appears the attachment was missing from the last email.
Please find decision attached.
Kind regards,
...
Can you explain to me why the OAIC will contact an individual who has made an IC Review on an FOI decision, to ask them if they want to withdraw the...
I asked a question a month ago now and that is more than a reasonable time to give response. There is no need for such rude and condescending conduc...
On 9 February I asked:
Dear INFORMATION.LAW,
There is a very large number of positions in this report listed as vacant.
Is this because of sta...
Verity Pane
Dear Verity Pane
Thank you for your email below regarding my decision in FOIREQ22/00008.
I note the decision provided you...
Given CATI is an order of magnitude more expensive, and is accepted as skewing the survey towards elderly clients, a 4/5th reduction in CASI numbers at...
OFFICIAL
Dear Ms Pane,
Please find attached decision in relation to your FOI request.
Kind regards,
Jessica
FOI Team
Inform...
Dear Verity Pane
The Department of Veterans’ Affairs (Department) has made a revised
decision under section 55G of the Freedom of Information Ac...
Good morning Verity Pane,
My apologies for the delay in responding to your query.
I can advise that it took approximately six hours in total to compi...
After 8 months and 15 days, DVA finally provides what it was always minimally required to under the Freedom of Information Act. In keeping with that...
Dear Verity Pane,
FOI 24762 - Revised decision and statement of reasons
Please find attached a revised decision issued to you in accordance...
Dear Ms Pane,
Good afternoon. Please see the attached decision letter and document from
the Australian Digital Health Agency.
Regards,
...
Dear Ms Pane
FOI 24761 – Decision and Statement of Reasons
Please find attached the decision relating to your freedom of information
reque...
Dear Ms Pane
I refer to your Freedom of Information request made on 8 November 2018.
Please find attached decision and documents.
Reg...
To INFORMATION.LAW,
This FOI was sent to DVA on Tuesday 6 November 2018, and as per s 15(5)(b) became due 30 days thereafter, which was on Thursday 6...
Dear Ms Pane
FOI 25408 – Decision and Statement of Reasons
Please find attached the decision relating to your freedom of information
reque...
Dear Ms Pane
I refer to your Freedom of Information request made on 1 November 2018.
Please see attached my decision and related documents....
Dear Ms Pane
Please find attached the decision and documents in relation to your FOI
request, FOIREQ18/00174.
Regards
[1]cid:image001...
Thanks Arthur, unfortunately the people over at the Department of Veterans‘ Affairs, particularly the Information Law area, do not change their unethic...
Thank you Megan, although it is disappointing to note that the Australian Digital Health Agency (ADHA) was not directly relevant to the OAIC’s quest...
I acknowledge your response that no records of any consideration of the probity of several senior OAIC accepting corporate hospitality from elevenM,...
This person's 164 annotations
(page 2)
Another retrospective s 15AB extension approved by the OAIC, in excess of 30 days, made without notice or consultation by either the Department or the...
FOI agencies just routinely ask or assume by default for agreements to extensions of time now, often on very vague and broad claims that realistically...
Worth highlighting that DVA received $98.5 million in last year's budget specifically for improving the claims backlog, but the Minister and DVA are no...
I've had FOIs that have received large files before, including from DVA, that did not require use of a private third party website that encrypts the fi...
Given CATI is an order of magnitude more expensive, and is accepted as skewing the survey towards elderly clients, a 4/5th reduction in CASI numbers at...
It is inappropriate to provide just one business day to respond to such matters.
Why is Veterans' Affairs sending DVA Secure Emails to Right to Know, which is for FOIs not involving personal information.
This FOI made no request...
Why is Veterans' Affairs sending DVA Secure Emails to Right to Know, which is for FOIs not involving personal information.
This FOI made no request...
Why is Veterans' Affairs sending DVA Secure Emails to Right to Know, which is for FOIs not involving personal information.
This FOI made no request...
Why is Veterans' Affairs sending DVA Secure Emails to Right to Know, which is for FOIs not involving personal information.
This FOI made no request f...
Ridiculous how DVA wastes, by orders of magnitude, Commonwealth resources unethically and unlawfully to delay or frustrate access, for even very straig...
Thanks Arthur, unfortunately the people over at the Department of Veterans‘ Affairs, particularly the Information Law area, do not change their unethic...
IC Review applied for 26 November 2018
IC Review applied for 21 November 2018
IC Review applied for 21 November 2018
IC Review applied for 14 November 2018
IC Review applied for 19 November 2018
IC Review applied for 23 October 2018
Another blatant abuse by DVA - the audit log is prominently displayed on the ‘Manage’ tab of the record entry in Record Manager - and DVA are deliberat...
Hi Fiona,
You are right, in that as a formal notice, the Department of Defence should not send out notices of intent to refuse (practical refusal) us...
I agree; I can see the point the journalist is trying to make, but it also needs to be viewed in the context that a privacy policy is a notice to indiv...
Hi Fiona,
It might be worth heading over to the Federal Parliament website, because if you are lucky, there might be a question on notice (or taken o...
As stated by the Information Commissioner:
...it is implicit that a charge must not be used to unnecessarily delay access or discourage an applicant f...
As stated by the Information Commissioner:
...it is implicit that a charge must not be used to unnecessarily delay access or discourage an applicant f...
