The number of disability service providers who have been charged vs participants

Karen Reynolds made this Freedom of Information request to NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

2 followers

Response to this request is long overdue. By law, under all circumstances, NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission should have responded by now (details). You can complain by requesting an internal review.

Dear NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission,

I would like to know;

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have been charged by the police for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have faced regulatory action from your agency for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have been charged by the police for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have faced regulatory action for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have been charged by the police for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have faced regulatory action from your agency for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have been charged by the police for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have faced regulatory action for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- of the above, what proportion of persons were registered providers of services and what proportion were unregistered

- how many participants have been charged by the police for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many participants have faced regulatory action from your agency for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many participants have been charged by the police for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- how many participants have faced regulatory action for other crimes which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- of the above, how many were self managing their funding

- how many complaints you have received about alleged wrongdoing by disability service providers

- how many complaints you have received about alleged wrongdoing by participants

Yours faithfully,

Karen Reynolds

Thank you for emailing the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission.

This inbox is monitored between 9 am and 5 pm (AEST), Monday to Friday and
we will respond to your enquiry within 5 business days.

Alternatively you can contact us on 1800 035 544, or visit the website at
[1]www.ndiscommission.gov.au for information and resources.

This is an automated email. Please do not respond.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/

image001.jpg

3K Download

Dear Ms Reynolds

Freedom of Information Request No. (34) 20/21-4

I refer to your email below received by the NDIS Quality and Safeguards
Commission (the NDIS Commission) on 15 April 2021, in which you requested
access, under the Commonwealth Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act)
to the following information:

“I would like to know;

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have been
charged by the police for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have
faced regulatory action from your agency for fraud or other finance
related crime

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have been
charged by the police for other crimes which do not involve finance
related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or
restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who are NOT participants have
faced regulatory action for other crimes which do not involve finance
related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or
restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have been
charged by the police for fraud or other finance related crime

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have faced
regulatory action from your agency for fraud or other finance related
crime

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have been
charged by the police for other crimes which do not involve finance
related crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or
restrictive practices

- how many disability service providers who ARE participants have faced
regulatory action for other crimes which do not involve finance related
crimes but abuse relating to violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive
practices

- of the above, what proportion of persons were registered providers of
services and what proportion were unregistered

- how many participants have been charged by the police for fraud or other
finance related crime

- how many participants have faced regulatory action from your agency for
fraud or other finance related crime

- how many participants have been charged by the police for other crimes
which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to
violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- how many participants have faced regulatory action for other crimes
which do not involve finance related crimes but abuse relating to
violence, abuse or neglect or restrictive practices

- of the above, how many were self managing their funding

- how many complaints you have received about alleged wrongdoing by
disability service providers

- how many complaints you have received about alleged wrongdoing by
participants”

Timing

The statutory period for processing your request is 30 days commencing
from the day after we received your request. Accordingly, the deadline for
notifying you of the NDIS Commission’s decision on access is 15 May 2021.
I note that 15 May 2021 is a Saturday. In accordance with the FOI
guidelines issued by the Australian Information Commissioner, if the last
day for notifying a decision falls on a Saturday, Sunday or a public
holiday, the timeframe will expire on the first business day following
that day. As such, the due date for our decision on your request for
access is 17 May. The period of time to decide your request may be
extended if we need to consult third parties or for other reasons. We will
advise you if this happens.

Charging

You will be notified as soon as possible if a charge is associated with
processing your request.

Disclosure log

Information released by the NDIS Commission under the FOI Act is required
to be published on the FOI disclosure log on our website, and made
publicly available, unless certain exceptions apply. For example, personal
or business information will not be published where this would be
unreasonable. Your views are sought as to whether the information should
be placed on the disclosure log.

Contact details

The NDIS Commission will correspond with you by email in relation to your
FOI request. Should you have any queries about this matter, please do not
hesitate to contact me via email to [1][email address]

Yours sincerely

Maryanne

Maryanne McCarthy

Legal Project Co-ordinator

[2]cid:image001.jpg@01D41218.BD3EEDC0

Note: This email and any attachments may contain confidential or legally
privileged information (and neither are waived or lost if this email has
been sent to you by mistake). If you are not the intended recipient, you
must not use, disclose, copy or retain it. If you have received it in
error, please let me know by reply email and then delete this email from
your system and do not retain any copy. Recipients within the NDIS
Commission should seek assistance from General Counsel before
disseminating this email to third parties or using this advice for a
different matter.

The NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission acknowledges the traditional
owners of country throughout Australia and their continuing connection to
land, sea and community. We pay our respects to them and their cultures,
and to elders both past and present.

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Reynolds <[3][FOI #7254 email]>
Sent: Thursday, 15 April 2021 2:47 PM
To: FOI (NDIS Commission) <[4][NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - The number of disability service
providers who have been charged vs participants