Good morning Siri

 

Thank you for your email of 25 February 2016.

 

As advised to you yesterday in response to your original request, in order
for a request to be valid for the purposes of the FOI Act, it must provide
such information concerning the document you are seeking access to as it
reasonably necessary to enable the Department to identify it.

 

I understand your request to be for the following:

“1. compiled statistics that tells me how many applications [for Partner
visa (subclasses 820 and 801)] you get a year and how many of these
applications are rejected.

and

2. in the cases were the couples do get rejected, is there any documents
regarding the reasons behind it.  Perhaps a specific case file where
there's been enough evidence to claim that the relationship has been
inaccurate or straight out false.”

 

In relation to the first part of your request, whilst you have identified
that your require statistics in relation to applications received by the
Department for Partner visas, the request remains broad because you have
not limited it to a specific time period.  Your request effectively
therefore has an infinite time span, which could potentially create a
substantial and unreasonable diversion of the Department’s resources to
process.  As such, in order for part 1 of your request to be valid, it
would assist if you could limit the timeframe of the request – for example
to the financial year 2014-2015.

 

In relation to the second part of your request, you may have provide
sufficient information to enable the Department to identify the documents
you are requesting access to, in that you have requested access to “a
specific case file where there's been enough evidence to claim that the
relationship has been inaccurate or straight out false”.  However, I note
that any such documents would contain extensive personal information
relating to third parties. 

 

The Department has a duty to manage personal information in a manner that
is consistent with the Privacy Act.  Any request to the Department for
access to this type of information under the FOI Act will be considered
individually on its merits taking into account any exemptions under the
FOI Act that may apply, including section 47F in relation to personal
privacy.

 

I would also remind you that as you are not seeking access to your own
personal information, charges may be imposed by the Department in
accordance with the Schedule to the Freedom of Information (Charges)
Regulations 1982.  A copy of that schedule was set out in my email to you
of yesterday’s date.

 

I do not currently consider your request to be valid for the purposes of
the FOI Act, for the reasons stated above.  If you wish to reconsider the
scope of your request and clarify the information you are seeking access
to, the Department may be able to consider whether it holds any relevant
information.

 

If you require any further assistance, please do not hesitate to contact
me.

With kind regards
Alison Smith
FOI Officer | Freedom of Information Section
Information Management Branch
Department of Immigration and Border Protection
E| [email address]

Please consider the environment before printing this email

 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: Siri Linde [mailto:[FOI #1618 email]]
Sent: Thursday, 25 February 2016 9:13 PM
To: FOI
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Rejected Spouse(Defacto) Visas

 

Dear Minister for Immigration and Border Protection,

 

I am a student at Macleay College in Sydney where I am doing my bachelor
degree in Journalism.

 

I am very interested in digging out more detailed information (than what
is offered on the [1]www.border.gov.au website) about partnership visas
between international travellers and Australian citizens.

 

Since Australia is one of the worlds most popular destinations for travels
and also a country with a job politic that offers work opportunities even
for international backpackers, it is very often these travellers manage to
get settled and create a "home" and would do anything to stay for longer
than their limited visa has to offer, especially if the've met a partner
who lives here permanently.

 

There are opportunities in these cases to extend your visa on a so called
Partner visa (subclasses 820 and 801) but it is something that takes a lot
of time, something that is very expensive, the requirements are very
strict and it is not always these visa applications gets granted.

 

I would like you to provide me with compiled statistics that tells me how
many applications you get a year and how many of these applications that
gets rejected.

 

And in the cases were the couples do get rejected, is there any documents
regarding the reasons behind it.  Perhaps a specific case file where
there's been enough evidece to claim that the relationship has been
inaccurate or straight out false.

 

It would be interesting to find out how the government decides what is
"true love" and what is only an extension of a visa.

 

Yours faithfully,

Sir Linde

Journalist Student at Macleay College

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Please use this email address for all replies to this request:

[2][FOI #1618 email]

 

Is [3][email address] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to Minister for Immigration and Border Protection? If so, please
contact us using this form:

[4]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...

 

This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:

[5]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

 

If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.

 

 

-------------------------------------------------------------------

 

Important Notice: The content of this email is intended only for use by
the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received
this email by mistake, please advise the sender and delete the message and
attachments immediately.  This email, including attachments, may contain
confidential, sensitive, legally privileged and/or copyright information.
 

Any review, retransmission, dissemination or other use of this information
by persons or entities other than the intended recipient is prohibited. 
DIBP respects your privacy and has obligations under the Privacy Act 1988.
 

Unsolicited commercial emails MUST NOT be sent to the originator of this
email.

References

Visible links
1. http://www.border.gov.au/
2. mailto:[FOI #1618 email]
3. mailto:[email address]
4. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
5. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...

hide quoted sections