Private use of social media advice provided to employees
Dear WA Department of Corrective Services,
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.
I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours faithfully,
James Smith
Mr Smith
I refer to my previous email of today. I have also attached a copy of a brochure on the use of FOI in this State.
For your information, the former Department of Corrective Services and Department of the Attorney General were merged on 1 July 2017 to become the Department of Justice.
David Young | Information Officer | Corporate Services
Department of Justice | Public Access Level 9 141 St George’s Tce PERTH WA 6000
t: 9264 1133 | f: 9481 8504 | | w: www.justice.wa.gov.au
-----Original Message-----
From: James Smith [mailto:[FOI #3846 email]]
Sent: Tuesday, 8 August 2017 5:22 PM
To: FOI DCS
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Private use of social media advice provided to employees
Dear WA Department of Corrective Services,
This is a request under the Freedom of Information Act.
I request documents related to the ten most recent instances where an employee has sought information, advice, guidance, or opinion on their social media use in a private capacity.
I limit the scope of documents to:
- the original request from the employee
- the agency/department's response
- any follow-up questions and response
- only those sent to a relevant HR / conduct / social media (or similar) team (rather than managers across all areas of the organisation)
- where the original request was created in the last 2 years
Should you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me.
Yours faithfully,
James Smith
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #3846 email]
Is [WA Department of Corrective Services request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information requests to WA Department of Corrective Services? If so, please contact us using this form:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Disclaimer: The information contained in this e-mail may be private and
personal or otherwise confidential. If you are not the intended
recipient, any use, disclosure or copying of any part of the
information is unauthorised. If you have received this e-mail in
error, please inform the sender and delete the document.
Locutus Sum left an annotation ()
Mostly I classify a response like this one to say "clarification requested" because the agency has told the applicant that some more information (and money!) is needed before the request will be processed. This time, I have put the response in the category of "refused" because it is two months when the agency has responded and the applicant has not made a follow-up. This does not mean that the agency will refuse the request when an application is made in the correct (required) way and although I have made the classification of "refused", the applicant can use this same request page if he wishes to pursue the request.