Instant messenger conversations

Danielle made this Freedom of Information request to Services Australia

This request has been closed to new correspondence from the public body. Contact us if you think it ought be re-opened.

The request was refused by Services Australia.

Dear Department of Human Services,

Can I please request the instant messenger conversations of the FOI Team from March 2017 - present.

Yours faithfully,

Danielle

FOI.LEGAL.TEAM,

2 Attachments

Dear Danielle

 

Please find attached correspondence in relation to your Freedom of
Information request (LEX 32104).

 

Regards

 

Jack

FOI Legal Team

FOI and Litigation Branch | Legal Services Division

Department of Human Services

* [1][email address]

 

[2]Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: cid:image001.png@01CD1993.20C1C870

This email and any attachments may contain information subject to legal
professional privilege or information that is otherwise sensitive or
confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, you are
prohibited from using or disseminating this communication. If you have
received this communication in error please notify the sender immediately
and permanently delete this email.

 

show quoted sections

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Dear FOI.LEGAL.TEAM,

I would like copies of instant messenger trials between members of the FOI Legal Team that discuss the use of names in FOI related correspondence.

Yours sincerely,

Danielle

FOI.LEGAL.TEAM,

2 Attachments

Dear Danielle,

 

Please find attached correspondence regarding your Freedom of Information
request.

 

Kind regards,

 

Chelsea

FOI Legal Team

FOI and Litigation Branch | Legal Services Division
Department of Human Services

[1][email address]

[2]Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: Description: Description:
Description: Description: Description: cid:image001.png@01CE26E6.4AB93B70

show quoted sections

 

**********************************************************************
IMPORTANT: This e-mail is for the use of the intended recipient only and
may contain information that is confidential, commercially valuable and/or
subject to legal or parliamentary privilege. If you are not the intended
recipient you are notified that any review, re-transmission, disclosure,
dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in reliance upon,
this information is prohibited and may result in severe penalties. If you
have received this e-mail in error please notify the sender immediately
and delete all electronic and hard copies of this transmission together
with any attachments. Please consider the environment before printing this
e-mail
**********************************************************************

References

Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]

Locutus Sum left an annotation ()

The department told the applicant that a "practical refusal reason" existed for refusing the request. This is usually a statement that the application is too broad or that it would take too much time. The applicant was invited to change the application but she did not do so. Because of this the request is take at law to have been withdrawn by the applicant.