Details of the current status of Equinor ASA's application to explore in the Great Australian Bight
Dear National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority,
I am a journalism academic at University of Technology Sydney. I am seeking details of the current status of the application by Equinor ASA to explore and drill for oil in the Great Australian Bight.
I wish to know if and when Equinor has lodged an application to explore, whether that application is under consideration by NOPSEMA and when you expect to make a determination.
In particular I am seeking any documents submitted by Equinor ASA to NOPSEMA in connection with their application for an exploration licence if such documents have already been lodged.
I am also seeking details of any correspondence between Equinor ASA and Nopsema regarding such an application.
Yours faithfully,
Tom Morton
For Official Use Only
Dear Mr Morton
Thank you for your email.
Status of Equinor application:
Equinor published their draft Environment Plan (EP) on their web site for
public comment on 21 February 2019. Equinor has yet to formally submit any
EP to NOPSEMA for assessment, following closure of the public comment
period on 21 March 2019. A copy of their EP can be found in full (in
addition to further information regarding the proposed activity) here:
[1]https://www.equinor.com/en/where-we-are/...
NOPSEMA’s official regulatory role does not commence until Equinor
formally submits the EP for assessment. The timing of a formal submission
is a matter for Equinor, and is not set by NOPSEMA. To keep up-to-date
with details of oil and activities offshore, particularly the status of a
submission once submitted to NOPSEMA, please see:
[2]https://www.nopsema.gov.au/environmental...
Exploration licence:
In relation to licencing, the National Offshore Titles Administrator
(NOPTA) is the agency responsible for issuing exploration
permits/licences. Information regarding Equinor's current exploration
permits can be found here:
[3]https://neats.nopta.gov.au/TitleRegister...
Kind regards
FOI Coordinator
National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management Authority
T: (08) 6188 8700 | E: [4][email address] | W: nopsema.gov.au
Regulating for safe and environmentally responsible offshore energy
industries.
-----Original Message-----
From: Tom MORTON <[FOI #5364 email]>
Sent: Tuesday, 9 April 2019 9:35 AM
To: [FOI Shared Mailbox] <[email address]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Details of the current status of
Equinor ASA's application to explore in the Great Australian Bight
Dear National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental Management
Authority,
I am a journalism academic at University of Technology Sydney. I am
seeking details of the current status of the application by Equinor ASA to
explore and drill for oil in the Great Australian Bight.
I wish to know if and when Equinor has lodged an application to explore,
whether that application is under consideration by NOPSEMA and when you
expect to make a determination.
In particular I am seeking any documents submitted by Equinor ASA to
NOPSEMA in connection with their application for an exploration licence if
such documents have already been lodged.
I am also seeking details of any correspondence between Equinor ASA and
Nopsema regarding such an application.
Yours faithfully,
Tom Morton
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[5][FOI #5364 email]
Is [6][NOPSEMA request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to National Offshore Petroleum Safety and Environmental
Management Authority? If so, please contact us using this form:
[7]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[8]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
For Official Use Only
Important: This message and any attachments is intended for the use of the
addressee only and may contain confidential, sensitive personal or legally
privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient you must not
read, disseminate or retain the message or any part of it, and inform the
sender immediately. NOPSEMA does not guarantee that this message is
secure, error-free or free of viruses or other undesirable inclusions.
Please consider the environment before printing this email
References
Visible links
1. https://www.equinor.com/en/where-we-are/...
2. https://www.nopsema.gov.au/environmental...
3. https://neats.nopta.gov.au/TitleRegister...
4. mailto:[email address]
5. mailto:[FOI #5364 email]
6. mailto:[NOPSEMA request email]
7. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
8. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Locutus Sum left an annotation ()
To the applicant: You might wish to write immediately again to the agency to clarify your application. The Commonwealth Freedom of Inforamation Act gives you a legally enforceable right to certain documents. It does not give you a right to have questions answered by an agency although the agency can always choose to answer your questions.
Your application mentions particular documents at one place. You ask for a copy of documents submitted by Equinor ASA. That part of the application is valid. But you also ask whether an application has been submitted. Strangely, that part is invalid. Instead you must rely on the agency looking for the application documents and then maybe telling you that they could not find any!
The last part of your application could be valid but is not. What do you mean when you say "details of ...". Probably you actually mean "a copy of". If this is so, you should say so as early as possible so that you do not waste 30 days. Also it is helpful if you tell the agency a sensible time frame to search for "correspondence". How far in the past must they look? Do they need to search an archive?
By limiting the scope of your request it is more likely that it will get to the point of being considered properly. If you do not do that, you will find that the agency tells you that there is a "practical refusal reason" (too much work and guessing for the agency) and you will be back where you started.