This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 17)
Thanks for your response
Yours sincerely,
Pseudonym
Hi Morgan,
Thanks for the clarification and for the quick actioning of the request
Yours sincerely,
Pseudonym
OFFICIAL
--
Freedom of Information
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)
Australian Government
www.dta.gov.au
Email: [DTA request email]
+61 2 6120 8...
OFFICIAL
--
Freedom of Information
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)
Australian Government
www.dta.gov.au
Email: [DTA request email]
+61 2 6120 8...
OFFICIAL
--
Freedom of Information
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)
Australian Government
www.dta.gov.au
Email: [DTA request email]
+61 2 6120 8...
OFFICIAL
--
Freedom of Information
Digital Transformation Agency (DTA)
Australian Government
www.dta.gov.au
Email: [DTA request email]
+61 2 6120 8...
Seek an internal review. Try to explain why you disagree with their decision (can be in plain words). Then if they still refuse you can appeal to the I...
Dear Sir,
Please see attachment.
Yours faithfully,
FOI Team
Dear Applicant,
The ATO has received your email dated 28 Sep...
You appear to have not sent me any specific correspondence, can you please advise what this communication means or how to decrypt what you have sent...
Dear Mr Tarte
Please see attached correspondence in relation to your Freedom of
Information request.
Kind regards,
Stacey
FOI Lega...
Dear Mr Tarte,
Please find attached our correspondence regarding your Freedom of
Information request.
Kind regards
Chris
FOI Pract...
I redid this FOI privately and got a 24A decision on what I was interested in, the PIA's for these https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/Data-matching-pro...
Dear Mr Tarte
Please find attached correspondence in relation to your Freedom of
Information request (LEX 28087).
Regards
FOI Legal...
Good afternoon Mr Tarte
Please see attached decision in relation to your request for access to
documents under the Freedom of Information Act 19...
Dear Mr Tarte
Please find below a final response from the DTA in relation to your request.
I refer to your request for access to documents.
Your req...
Dear Mr Tarte
Please see attached a decision in respect of your FOI Request No.
16/17-104.
Kind regards
FOI Team
Governanc...
UNCLASSIFIED
FOI 19-1617
Dear Mr Tarte,
Please see attached correspondence in relation to your FOI Request dated
24 January 2017.
...
This person's 18 annotations
So this whole thing is somewhat of a dogs breakfast, any recommendations on where too from here as my legalese is overstretched already?
Seems like they have sent something higher than unclassified to you.
Odd response. Didn't ATO just get chided for doing the same thing?
I redid this FOI privately and got a 24A decision on what I was interested in, the PIA's for these https://www.ato.gov.au/General/Gen/Data-matching-pro...
Have DHS been in touch with you or you with them between your initial request and the notice above? Seems very, very wrong to have gone straight to a 2...
Your requests seem like things that would be in a documents so prefacing each section with something like "any document that contains or describes XXX"...
I have switched it to refused as you are right that that is essentially what they have done.
Thanks for the update, very keen to know how this progresses.
It appears I have started jumping at shadows of dodgy responses. This is indeed pretty clear cut isn't it?
DHS have got the date wrong in the due date for the review. I assume they mean April not March.
This seems to have missed some consultation steps, going straight to a refusal doesn't indicate willingness to be open and transparent.
It appears my eyes are painted on, apologies, how did I miss the number of pages?
Wow, definitely seems like a charge to delay. How can 6 hours decision making be involved?
I have requested this again through an anonymous emailer and will update this with responses.
Even if it is about the methods to investigate IT use in secure networks the APS does nothing special. The methods would be the same as any professiona...
Wow, that's awesomely quick and quality. Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care look top notch.
Search and retrieval time seems to be based off of the initial full search scope rather than the agreed narrower scope.
I think their response to your other FOI about the process has attached here