Trustee Disclosure Obligations - Access to orginal Trust Deeds
Dear Australian Securities and Investments Commission,
Lawyers for ASIC have written to ASIC whistleblower, John Adams, claiming that “ASIC is not Corrupt”.
If this is the case, then ASIC would not have assisted a number of trustees in stealing superannuation death benefit entitlements from widows of fund members and grossly underpaying members of Defined Benefit superannuation fund by way of what might be termed a “Deed Substitution Fraud”.
The Commonwealth Parliament identified a “loop hole” in the law that would allow such frauds against widows and sought to close this “loop hole” by enacting the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Further MySuper and Transparency Measures) Act 2012 that required trustees of Employer-Sponsored Defined Benefit to make a copy of the original Trust Deed that constituted and established every Defined Benefit Fund that they administer available for download on the public section of their websites. Superannuation trusts, funds and schemes are legally identified by the original Trust Deed that constituted and establsihed that trust (fund).
If an amending power had been reserved in the original Trust Deed then copies of all amending Deeds (and other authorised amending Instruments) had to be made available for download as well as confirmed in the Explanatory Memorandum.
A copy of the most recent actuarial report had to be provided as well.
This Act provided similar transparency as that provided by the Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Fund (PCSS) which will provide a superannuation pension to the Prime Minister and the Leader of the Opposition and a survivorship pension to their widows.
None of these documents makes reference to the commercial agreement between the sponsoring- employer and the trustee which is a separate contract document.
A trustee of a Defined Benefit fund must pay superannuation benefits when they fall due based on the original Trust Deed and all legally valid Amending Deeds read as “one legal document”.
The is only one “Trust Deed” and not a multiple of “Trust Deeds”.
An example of a “Deed Substitution Fraud” “ is as follows:
The original Trust Deed of a Defined Benefit fund that was established several decades ago provide a lump sum benefit of $20,000 to a member for every year of service with the sponsoring employer.
Over the decades there were two amending Deeds executed in accordance with the conditions and restrictions of the amending power reserved in the original Trust Deed that increase the annual benefit factor from $20,000 to $22,000 and then to $24,000.
The average period of service before retiring or being retired by the employer was 25 years and there were 1000 members of this Defined Benefit fund and so the amount held on trust in the fund is $600 million.
Therefore a typical fund members would receive a lump sum benefit of $600,000 on retirement.
The sponsoring employer is taken over and a new trustee is appointed.
The trustee drafts what appears to be a legal document (Deed) where the benefit factor is stated as $18,000 for every year of service.
A typical member who now retires only receives $450,000 instead of $600,000.
The amount required to be held in the fund is now only $450 million or some $150 million less tha before.
Members who complain are show a copy of the “Latest Version of the Trust Deed” which purports to provide a benefit of $18,000 for every year of service.
Meanwhile, the white-collar criminals who were appointed as the new trustees have used “creative accounting” to transfer the surplus $150 million in the members’ fund to their own “investment company” which then transfers the $150 million to the white-collar criminals and the “investment” is then written down to zero and blamed on “adverse investment market conditions”.
If the fund members, their wives and widows can inspect the original Trust Deed and all amending Deeds by downloading them from the trustee’s website which was the intention of the Commonwealth Parliament, the fund members (and their lawyers) can easily determine that the trustee has engaged in fraudulent conduct costing each fund member who retires $150,000 in lawful benefits.
The fund members now are entitled to compensation as confirmed by a former Minister for Superannuation, the Hon Bill Shorten MP who stated in a Media Release dated 13 April 2011:
"Investors in Regulated Superannuation Funds deserve to be compensated by the Government when they lose their investments through fraud or other malfeasance by super fund trustees. I’m very pleased to be able to offer Trio investors this compensation," Mr Shorten said.
ASIC Deputy Chair, Sarah Court, in testimony before the Senate Economics Reference Committee that ASIC was placing a high priority on non-payment and delayed payments of death benefits by trustees of Regulated Superannuation Funds.
"Dodgy super funds are not above the law"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnyRa0jj...
"Labor is letting Big Super to break the law. It stinks."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmOhf7qC...
"Australia needs to get serious about corporate crime. How is the status quo OK?"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoHVQLxI...
Request for Documents pursuant the Freedom of Information Act 1982:
This FOI request is for copies of documents including emails from ASIC to Senators, Members of Parliament, Parliamentary Committees or The Treasury and replies related Section 29B of the Superannuation Industry (Supervision) Act 1993 {SIS Act } and related SIS Regulation 2.28 related to the reason ASIC has provided for granting “Relief” for over a decade to a number of trustees of employer-sponsored Defined Benefit superannuation funds.
The reason ASIC has given is as follows:
“ASIC first provided this relief by class order in 2014, and since then has extended the period of relief in successive instruments. This has been to facilitate Government consideration of industry feedback in relation to the operation of section 29QB to require potentially sensitive information in relation to the commercial terms negotiated with different employer sponsors.”
"Relief" was provided for over a decade out to 30 June 2024.
The search period is from the date the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Further MySuper and Transparency Measures) Bill 2012 was given royal assent on 03 Dec 2012 to the present.
Yours faithfully,
P.C. Sweeney
Dear Mr Sweeney
Freedom of Information Request No. 147-2024
I refer to the below email dated 11 July 2024 in which you seek access to
documents under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act).
The 30-day statutory time period for processing your request commenced on
the day after the day on which your request was received (s 15(5) of the
FOI Act). The due date to issue a decision on your request is therefore 12
August 2024.
The 30-day processing period may be extended should ASIC find it is
necessary to consult third parties, where a charge is to be imposed on the
processing of the request or for other reasons. You will be advised if
there are changes to the 30-day processing period.
Please note that any documents released to you under the FOI Act may later
be published online on the ASIC disclosure log in accordance with our
obligation to do so under the Act. This requirement to publish released
documents is subject to certain exceptions for example, personal or
business information will not be published where it would be unreasonable.
Regards,
Krystal Fung
Lawyer, FOI & Privacy
Legal Services
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Level 7, 120 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000
[1][email address]
[2]ASIC logo
ASIC is committed to [3]diversity and inclusion. ASIC is a place of
belonging regardless of difference, where all individuals are accepted,
safe and affirmed.
-----Original Message-----
From: P.C. Sweeney <[4][FOI #11671 email]>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 2:10 PM
To: FOIrequest <[5][ASIC request email]>
Subject: Freedom of Information request - Trustee Disclosure Obligations -
Access to orginal Trust Deeds
[You don't often get email from
[6][FOI #11671 email]. Learn why this is
important at [7]https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific... ]
EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click any links or open any attachments unless you
trust the sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Australian Securities and Investments Commission,
Lawyers for ASIC have written to ASIC whistleblower, John Adams, claiming
that “ASIC is not Corrupt”.
If this is the case, then ASIC would not have assisted a number of
trustees in stealing superannuation death benefit entitlements from widows
of fund members and grossly underpaying members of Defined Benefit
superannuation fund by way of what might be termed a “Deed Substitution
Fraud”.
The Commonwealth Parliament identified a “loop hole” in the law that would
allow such frauds against widows and sought to close this “loop hole” by
enacting the Superannuation Legislation Amendment (Further MySuper and
Transparency Measures) Act 2012 that required trustees of
Employer-Sponsored Defined Benefit to make a copy of the original Trust
Deed that constituted and established every Defined Benefit Fund that they
administer available for download on the public section of their websites.
Superannuation trusts, funds and schemes are legally identified by the
original Trust Deed that constituted and establsihed that trust (fund).
If an amending power had been reserved in the original Trust Deed then
copies of all amending Deeds (and other authorised amending Instruments)
had to be made available for download as well as confirmed in the
Explanatory Memorandum.
A copy of the most recent actuarial report had to be provided as well.
This Act provided similar transparency as that provided by the
Parliamentary Contributory Superannuation Fund (PCSS) which will provide a
superannuation pension to the Prime Minister and the Leader of the
Opposition and a survivorship pension to their widows.
None of these documents makes reference to the commercial agreement
between the sponsoring- employer and the trustee which is a separate
contract document.
A trustee of a Defined Benefit fund must pay superannuation benefits when
they fall due based on the original Trust Deed and all legally valid
Amending Deeds read as “one legal document”.
The is only one “Trust Deed” and not a multiple of “Trust Deeds”.
An example of a “Deed Substitution Fraud” “ is as follows:
The original Trust Deed of a Defined Benefit fund that was established
several decades ago provide a lump sum benefit of $20,000 to a member for
every year of service with the sponsoring employer.
Over the decades there were two amending Deeds executed in accordance with
the conditions and restrictions of the amending power reserved in the
original Trust Deed that increase the annual benefit factor from $20,000
to $22,000 and then to $24,000.
The average period of service before retiring or being retired by the
employer was 25 years and there were 1000 members of this Defined Benefit
fund and so the amount held on trust in the fund is $600 million.
Therefore a typical fund members would receive a lump sum benefit of
$600,000 on retirement.
The sponsoring employer is taken over and a new trustee is appointed.
The trustee drafts what appears to be a legal document (Deed) where the
benefit factor is stated as $18,000 for every year of service.
A typical member who now retires only receives $450,000 instead of
$600,000.
The amount required to be held in the fund is now only $450 million or
some $150 million less tha before.
Members who complain are show a copy of the “Latest Version of the Trust
Deed” which purports to provide a benefit of $18,000 for every year of
service.
Meanwhile, the white-collar criminals who were appointed as the new
trustees have used “creative accounting” to transfer the surplus $150
million in the members’ fund to their own “investment company” which then
transfers the $150 million to the white-collar criminals and the
“investment” is then written down to zero and blamed on “adverse
investment market conditions”.
If the fund members, their wives and widows can inspect the original Trust
Deed and all amending Deeds by downloading them from the trustee’s website
which was the intention of the Commonwealth Parliament, the fund members
(and their lawyers) can easily determine that the trustee has engaged in
fraudulent conduct costing each fund member who retires $150,000 in
lawful benefits.
The fund members now are entitled to compensation as confirmed by a former
Minister for Superannuation, the Hon Bill Shorten MP who stated in a Media
Release dated 13 April 2011:
"Investors in Regulated Superannuation Funds deserve to be compensated by
the Government when they lose their investments through fraud or other
malfeasance by super fund trustees. I’m very pleased to be able to offer
Trio investors this compensation," Mr Shorten said.
ASIC Deputy Chair, Sarah Court, in testimony before the Senate Economics
Reference Committee that ASIC was placing a high priority on non-payment
and delayed payments of death benefits by trustees of Regulated
Superannuation Funds.
"Dodgy super funds are not above the law"
[8]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnyRa0jj...
"Labor is letting Big Super to break the law. It stinks."
[9]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmOhf7qC...
"Australia needs to get serious about corporate crime. How is the status
quo OK?"
[10]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoHVQLxI...
Request for Documents pursuant the Freedom of Information Act 1982:
This FOI request is for copies of documents including emails from ASIC to
Senators, Members of Parliament, Parliamentary Committees or The Treasury
and replies related Section 29B of the Superannuation Industry
(Supervision) Act 1993 {SIS Act } and related SIS Regulation 2.28 related
to the reason ASIC has provided for granting “Relief” for over a decade to
a number of trustees of employer-sponsored Defined Benefit superannuation
funds.
The reason ASIC has given is as follows:
“ASIC first provided this relief by class order in 2014, and since then
has extended the period of relief in successive instruments. This has been
to facilitate Government consideration of industry feedback in relation to
the operation of section 29QB to require potentially sensitive information
in relation to the commercial terms negotiated with different employer
sponsors.”
"Relief" was provided for over a decade out to 30 June 2024.
The search period is from the date the Superannuation Legislation
Amendment (Further MySuper and Transparency Measures) Bill 2012 was given
royal assent on 03 Dec 2012 to the present.
Yours faithfully,
P.C. Sweeney
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[11][FOI #11671 email]
Is [12][ASIC request email] the wrong address for Freedom of Information
requests to Australian Securities and Investments Commission? If so,
please contact us using this form:
[13]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This
message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet.
More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
[14]https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
Please note that in some cases publication of requests and responses will
be delayed.
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web
manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please consider the environment before printing this document.
Information collected by ASIC may contain personal information. Please
refer to our [15]Privacy Policy for information about how we handle your
personal information, your rights to seek access to and correct
your personal information, and how to complain about breaches of your
privacy by ASIC.
This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and
may be confidential. They may contain legally privileged, copyright
material or personal and /or confidential information. You should not
read, copy, use or disclose the content without authorisation. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender as soon as
possible, delete the email and destroy any copies. This notice should not
be removed.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
3. https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-d...
4. mailto:[FOI #11671 email]
5. mailto:[ASIC request email]
6. mailto:[FOI #11671 email]
7. https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentific...
8. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MnyRa0jj...
9. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BmOhf7qC...
10. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CoHVQLxI...
11. mailto:[FOI #11671 email]
12. mailto:[ASIC request email]
13. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/change_re...
14. https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
15. https://asic.gov.au/privacy/
Dear Mr Sweeney,
Please see notice of access decision.
Kind regards,
Krystal Fung
Lawyer, FOI & Privacy
Legal Services
Australian Securities and Investments Commission
Level 7, 120 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000
[1][email address]
[2]ASIC logo
ASIC is committed to [3]diversity and inclusion. ASIC is a place of
belonging regardless of difference, where all individuals are accepted,
safe and affirmed.
Please consider the environment before printing this document.
Information collected by ASIC may contain personal information. Please
refer to our [4]Privacy Policy for information about how we handle your
personal information, your rights to seek access to and correct
your personal information, and how to complain about breaches of your
privacy by ASIC.
This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only and
may be confidential. They may contain legally privileged, copyright
material or personal and /or confidential information. You should not
read, copy, use or disclose the content without authorisation. If you have
received this email in error, please notify the sender as soon as
possible, delete the email and destroy any copies. This notice should not
be removed.
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
3. https://asic.gov.au/about-asic/what-we-d...
4. https://asic.gov.au/privacy/