Number of premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of a Capital city.
Dear NBN Co Limited,
Can you please advise how many premises are mapped for a Skymuster connection (as at 12/11/2019) within a 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State?
(NT & ACT are excluded from this request)
Please breakdown the number of premises by each City.
Eg;
Sydney: ###, Melbourne: ###, Brisbane: ###, Perth: ###, Adelaide: ###, Hobart: ###.
Yours faithfully,
BIFMA.
To whom this may concern – Thank you for your request.
I will be in touch in due course with progress regarding this matter.
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
nbn acknowledges and pays respects to the traditional custodians of all
the lands upon which we work.
Notice to recipient: This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by
the addressee. It is confidential and may contain information that is
subject to legal professional privilege or protected by copyright. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail. Copyright, confidentiality and legal
professional privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken
delivery to you. Emails to/from nbn co limited ABN 86 136 533 741 may
undergo email filtering and virus scanning, including by third party
contractors, however, nbn co limited does not guarantee that any email or
any attachment is secure, error-free or free of viruses or other unwanted
or unexpected inclusions. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
be the views of nbn co limited.
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
To whom this may concern – Please find attached a request for payment in
relation to processing fees regarding your FOI request.
If you have any questions – or would like to raise any issues in a
non-public forum, please email me on the address, below.
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
nbn acknowledges and pays respects to the traditional custodians of all
the lands upon which we work.
Notice to recipient: This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by
the addressee. It is confidential and may contain information that is
subject to legal professional privilege or protected by copyright. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail. Copyright, confidentiality and legal
professional privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken
delivery to you. Emails to/from nbn co limited ABN 86 136 533 741 may
undergo email filtering and virus scanning, including by third party
contractors, however, nbn co limited does not guarantee that any email or
any attachment is secure, error-free or free of viruses or other unwanted
or unexpected inclusions. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
be the views of nbn co limited.
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Dear Mr Mesman,
I am requesting the charge imposed ($30) be waivered on public interest grounds.
(The $30 has been paid in the interim to allow continued processing of the FOI request while the waiver request is being reviewed.)
Reasons for the waiver request are outlined below.
1. The scope of the request is for the number of premises mapped to Skymuster within a 25km radius of a Capital City's GPO.
2. Any premises within 25km/h of a Capital City would not (by any reasonable definition) be considered Regional, Rural or Remote.
3. NBNco in all it's published literature regarding Skymuster (websites and hard copies), including social media posts by NBNco hosted on 3rd party websites and blog posts hosted on NBNCo's websites refer to Skymuster as delivering "the nbn™ broadband access network to homes and businesses in regional and remote Australia"
4. NBNco's CTO in a blog post dated 5 July 2017 implies that "outer suburban areas cannot be shoved onto Skymuster - NBNco must preserve this capacity for Regional and Remote Australians"
5. If premises within a 25km radius of a Capital City's GPO (these could reasonably be defined as "outer suburban areas") are mapped for Skymuster, this demonstrates NBNCo are misinforming the public in regards to how Skymuster is being used to conenct premises to NBN's network.
6. If NBNCo are misinforming the public, this is of public interest.
Yours sincerely,
BIFMA
To whom this may concern – Please find attached a copy of nbn’s FOI
decision in relation to this matter.
nbn will review your contentions requesting a fee waiver in due course.
Best, djm.
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
nbn acknowledges and pays respects to the traditional custodians of all
the lands upon which we work.
Notice to recipient: This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by
the addressee. It is confidential and may contain information that is
subject to legal professional privilege or protected by copyright. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail. Copyright, confidentiality and legal
professional privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken
delivery to you. Emails to/from nbn co limited ABN 86 136 533 741 may
undergo email filtering and virus scanning, including by third party
contractors, however, nbn co limited does not guarantee that any email or
any attachment is secure, error-free or free of viruses or other unwanted
or unexpected inclusions. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
be the views of nbn co limited.
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
Please find attached nbn’s FOI processing charge decision.
If you have any questions, please contact the writer by email.
Best, djm.
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
nbn acknowledges and pays respects to the traditional custodians of all
the lands upon which we work.
Notice to recipient: This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by
the addressee. It is confidential and may contain information that is
subject to legal professional privilege or protected by copyright. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail. Copyright, confidentiality and legal
professional privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken
delivery to you. Emails to/from nbn co limited ABN 86 136 533 741 may
undergo email filtering and virus scanning, including by third party
contractors, however, nbn co limited does not guarantee that any email or
any attachment is secure, error-free or free of viruses or other unwanted
or unexpected inclusions. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
be the views of nbn co limited.
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
To whom this may concern (BIFMA) – I am informed by the Right-to-Know
(RTK) moderators that it is the responsibility of individual requestors to
change the status of their requests, rather than that of the RTK
moderators.
I note the annotation on the file indicating that the application was
successful but the request for a fee waiver was refused, however, the
status is listed as “refused.”
I would ask that you please change the status to successful, noting that
information was released per the attached FOI decision, below.
Thank you and best regards, David Mesman
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
BIFMA left an annotation ()
Note: The request to refund the FOI fees was (unsurprisingly) refused. The FOI request itself was successful.
There is no facility on this website to mark the request as successful with other issues relating to the request (such as refund of fees) as refused.
The fees relating to this FOI request were not refunded upon request, meaning the last request made to NBN in relation to this FOI was refused.
BIFMA is therefore marking this request as refused.
Again, BIFMA acknowledges their FOI is successful and that the information they requested in their FOI is published both on this website and NBN's website/FOI disclosure log.
Dear David Mesman,
I note this FOI request has made news on the iTNews website: https://www.itnews.com.au/news/nbn-co-re...
Within that article it states:
"The FoI reveals there are 1033 premises connected to Sky Muster....
iTnews has confirmed these are all premises with active Sky Muster connections."
We are concerned that the FOI information released is not what was requested.
The FOI submitted requested information on all premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of the GPO in each Capital City. "Mapped" meant all premises that are mapped to recieve Skymuster (whether connected or not), not just active connections to Skymuster.
This should have either been self evident (as we would have requested "active connections" if we had wanted that information) or the request clarified by NBNCo prior to release.
Can you please provide either:
> An assurance the information released in the FOI is for all premises mapped for Skymsuter, and not just active connections;
> If the information released only provides for active connections, an update to the FOI providing information on all premsies mapped to receive Skymuster (whether the connection is active or not).
Yours sincerely,
BIFMA
Dear NBN Co Limited,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
We are writing to request an internal review of NBN Co Limited's handling of my FOI request 'Number of premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of a Capital city.'.
We had requested:
"how many premises are mapped for a Skymuster connection (as at 12/11/2019) within a 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State?
(NT & ACT are excluded from this request)
Please breakdown the number of premises by each City.
Eg;
Sydney: ###, Melbourne: ###, Brisbane: ###, Perth: ###, Adelaide: ###, Hobart: ###."
According to the published news report on iTNews, NBNCo has confirmed the information actually supplied for the FOI request was for premises "connected" to Skymuster within a 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State. This is not what was requested in the FOI and was not what we were lead to believe was supplied by NBNCo in the FOI.
https://www.itnews.com.au/news/nbn-co-re...
We would like this request reviewed please, and details provided as to why the wrong information was supplied for the FOI request.
We would also like the correct information released (at no additional cost), namely, all premises mapped to recieve a Skymuster connection within 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/n...
Yours faithfully,
BIFMA
To whom this may concern (BIFMA) - I apologise for not reverting earlier this week. I was unwell and away from work.
I confirm that that data provided was in relation to active Sky Muster™ connections. For reference, nbn does not use the term “mapped” to describe unconnected or inactive premises. nbn will consider your request for unconnected or inactive premises designated as Sky Muster™ connections in current nbn™ network deployment planning.
nbn will not charge you for the processing of this request for additional information, noting the confusion regarding the original terms. We will revert to you as soon as possible. Please note that nbn’s FOI Team will need to consider whether the additional data relates to nbn’s commercial activities and/or whether the data may be exempt from release.
Best regards, David Mesman
-----Original Message-----
From: BIFMA <[FOI #5894 email]>
Sent: Friday, 17 January 2020 7:00 AM
To: David Mesman <[email address]>
Subject: [External] RE: nbn FOI decision
This message is from an external sender - be cautious, particularly with links and attachments.
Dear David Mesman,
I note this FOI request has made news on the iTNews website: https://www.itnews.com.au/news/nbn-co-re...
Within that article it states:
"The FoI reveals there are 1033 premises connected to Sky Muster....
iTnews has confirmed these are all premises with active Sky Muster connections."
We are concerned that the FOI information released is not what was requested.
The FOI submitted requested information on all premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of the GPO in each Capital City. "Mapped" meant all premises that are mapped to recieve Skymuster (whether connected or not), not just active connections to Skymuster.
This should have either been self evident (as we would have requested "active connections" if we had wanted that information) or the request clarified by NBNCo prior to release.
Can you please provide either:
> An assurance the information released in the FOI is for all premises
> mapped for Skymsuter, and not just active connections; If the information released only provides for active connections, an update to the FOI providing information on all premsies mapped to receive Skymuster (whether the connection is active or not).
Yours sincerely,
BIFMA
-----Original Message-----
To whom this may concern (BIFMA) – I am informed by the Right-to-Know
(RTK) moderators that it is the responsibility of individual requestors to change the status of their requests, rather than that of the RTK moderators.
I note the annotation on the file indicating that the application was successful but the request for a fee waiver was refused, however, the status is listed as “refused.”
I would ask that you please change the status to successful, noting that information was released per the attached FOI decision, below.
Thank you and best regards, David Mesman
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team E [1][email address] Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #5894 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To whom this may concern (BIFMA) - I received this email as I was sending a response to you.
Please refer to my previous email.
Best regards, David Mesman
-----Original Message-----
From: BIFMA <[FOI #5894 email]>
Sent: Wednesday, 22 January 2020 5:25 PM
To: FOIOfficer <[email address]>
Subject: [External] Internal review of Freedom of Information request - Number of premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of a Capital city.
This message is from an external sender - be cautious, particularly with links and attachments.
Dear NBN Co Limited,
Please pass this on to the person who conducts Freedom of Information reviews.
We are writing to request an internal review of NBN Co Limited's handling of my FOI request 'Number of premises mapped for Skymuster within 25km of a Capital city.'.
We had requested:
"how many premises are mapped for a Skymuster connection (as at 12/11/2019) within a 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State?
(NT & ACT are excluded from this request) Please breakdown the number of premises by each City.
Eg;
Sydney: ###, Melbourne: ###, Brisbane: ###, Perth: ###, Adelaide: ###, Hobart: ###."
According to the published news report on iTNews, NBNCo has confirmed the information actually supplied for the FOI request was for premises "connected" to Skymuster within a 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State. This is not what was requested in the FOI and was not what we were lead to believe was supplied by NBNCo in the FOI.
https://www.itnews.com.au/news/nbn-co-re...
We would like this request reviewed please, and details provided as to why the wrong information was supplied for the FOI request.
We would also like the correct information released (at no additional cost), namely, all premises mapped to recieve a Skymuster connection within 25km radius of the GPO in each Capital City for each State.
A full history of my FOI request and all correspondence is available on the Internet at this address: https://www.righttoknow.org.au/request/n...
Yours faithfully,
BIFMA
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Please use this email address for all replies to this request:
[FOI #5894 email]
This request has been made by an individual using Right to Know. This message and any reply that you make will be published on the internet. More information on how Right to Know works can be found at:
https://www.righttoknow.org.au/help/offi...
If you find this service useful as an FOI officer, please ask your web manager to link to us from your organisation's FOI page.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
To whom this may concern (BIFMA):
Per my email of earlier this week, I have made a fresh FOI decision,
releasing in full the information requested.
If you have any questions, please don’t hesitate to contact me regarding
this matter.
David J Mesman
General Counsel │FOI, Privacy & Knowledge Management
Corporate Advisory and Systems Engineering & Operations Legal Team
E [1][email address]
Level 13/100 Mount Street, North Sydney NSW 2060
nbn acknowledges and pays respects to the traditional custodians of all
the lands upon which we work.
Notice to recipient: This e-mail is intended only to be read or used by
the addressee. It is confidential and may contain information that is
subject to legal professional privilege or protected by copyright. If you
are not the addressee indicated in this message (or responsible for
delivery of the message to that person), you may not copy or deliver this
message to anyone, and you should destroy this message and kindly notify
the sender by reply e-mail. Copyright, confidentiality and legal
professional privilege are not waived or lost by reason of mistaken
delivery to you. Emails to/from nbn co limited ABN 86 136 533 741 may
undergo email filtering and virus scanning, including by third party
contractors, however, nbn co limited does not guarantee that any email or
any attachment is secure, error-free or free of viruses or other unwanted
or unexpected inclusions. Any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to
be the views of nbn co limited.
PLEASE CONSIDER OUR ENVIRONMENT BEFORE PRINTING
References
Visible links
1. mailto:[email address]
BIFMA left an annotation ()
Note: The request to refund the FOI fees was (unsurprisingly) refused. The FOI request itself was successful.