This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'NDIS early childhood approach for under 9s'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-0315 
 
 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
ndis.gov.au 
22 October 2024 
 
Bob Buckley 
 
By email:
 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
  
Dear Bob Buckley 
 
Freedom of Information request — Request consultation process 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 7 September 2024, in which you requested access 
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National 
Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA). 
 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
“…all information relating to the preparation, publication, and disposition of this webpage 
and the document linked under “quality support for children”
, including but not limited to: 
 
* internal correspondence within the NDIA about the preparation, contents and 
publication of this information (emails, briefing notes etc). 
* correspondence between the NDIA and the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission 
about the preparation, contents, disposition, and publication of this material. 
* correspondence between the NDIA and any other external party about this information 
... definitely including sector engagement, consultation, advice, co-design or 
coproduction. 
* internal approval and review of this information . 
* copies of all internal working drafts of the information . 
* any information about why AHPRA is referenced but NASRHP is not.” 

 
Revision of scope 
On 21 September 2024, you agreed to narrow the date range of your request to a 2-year 
period, being from 20 August 2022 to 20 August 2024. 
 
Internal Consultation  
On the basis of the r revised scope, I initiated a preliminary search for documents by the 
NDIA’s Children’s Taskforce . Following the preliminary search, Children’s Taskforce 
advised me:   
•  The inclusion of a timeframe in the revised request has not reduced the number of 
responsive documents; and  
 
1  
 

link to page 2 link to page 2  
•  The preliminary search has returned more than 150 responsive documents, not 
including any attachments.  
 
Based on the advice provided, I consider that there are more than 750 pages worth of 
material that falls within the scope of your request as currently worded (not including the 
attachments). At a conservative estimate of spending two minutes reading each page, this 
would take an FOI officer more than 25 hours to simply review and collate the documents.   
 
I note that the documents that are assessed as being within scope of the request would then 
need to be reviewed for any sensitivities and possible exemption under the FOI Act. I would l 
also need to consider whether any further consultations were required and carry these out.  
A decision about disclosure would need to be made on each document, and a decision letter 
prepared. These steps would significantly increase the hours that it would take for an FOI 
officer to process your request. 
 
Practical refusal reason 
As a result of my enquiries, I am satisfied that the work involved in processing the request in 
its current form would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the Agency 
from its other operations.1  
 
I therefore intend to refuse your request on the basis of a ‘practical refusal reason’ under 
section 24AA of the FOI Act. A practical refusal reason exists if either (or both) of the 
following applies:  
 
a)  the work involved in the processing of the request would substantially and 
unreasonably divert the resources of the Agency from its other operations; and/or  
 
b)  the request does not satisfy the requirement in section 15(2)(b) of the FOI Act, which 
requires an FOI applicant to provide such information concerning the document/s 
they are seeking access to, to enable the Agency to be able to identify it or them  
 
In reaching this view, I have taken account o 
•  the internal advice from Children’s Taskforce, who are the subject matter experts 
within the NDIA. 
 
However, before I make a final decision, I am writing to provide you with an opportunity to 
revise your request.2 This is called a ‘request consultation process’ as set out under section 
24AB of the FOI Act. 
 
I am authorised to make this decision under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. 
 
Request consultation process 
In circumstances where an Agency is considering a practical refusal, it is required to 
undertake a request consultation process under section 24AB of the FOI Act. The purpose of 
this letter is to initiate that process. You now have 14 days to do one of the following: 
 
1 Section 24AA of the FOI Act.   
2 Section 24AB of the FOI Act. 

 


 
 
•  withdraw your request; 
•  make a revised request; or 
•  indicate that you do not wish to revise the request (in which case the current   scope 
of your request will stand).  
 
If you do not do one of the three things listed above during the consultation period, your 
request will be processed on the basis of the current scope, and it is likely to be refused on 
the basis that processing it would represent a substantial and unreasonable diversion of the 
Agency’s resources.  
 
During this period, you are welcome to seek assistance to revise your request. If you revise 
your request in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined above, 
we will recommence processing it.  
 
Please note that the time taken to consult with you regarding the scope of your request is not 
taken into account for the purposes of calculating the timeframe for processing your request.  
 
If you wish to discuss this process, please contact me by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
If you do not contact me within this period, that is by 6 November 2024, your FOI request will 
be taken to have been withdrawn under subsection 24AB(7) and will not be dealt with any 
further. 
 
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Wendy
 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer  
Complaints Management & FOI Branch 
General Counsel Division