This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'TAB documents from the list (neurological)'.


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL
For Internal Use Only 
Physiotherapy and exercise for progressive 
neurological conditions 
The content of this document is OFFICIAL. 
Please note: 
The research and literature reviews collated by our TAB Research Team are not to be shared 
external to the Branch. These are for internal TAB use only and are intended to assist our 
advisors with their reasonable and necessary decision-making. 
Delegates have access to a wide variety of comprehensive guidance material. If Delegates 
require further information on access or planning matters, they are to call the TAPS line for 
advice. 
The Research Team are unable to ensure that the information listed below provides an 
accurate & up-to-date snapshot of these matters 
Research questions: 
What is considered best practice for the frequency and duration of physiotherapy and 
exercise physiology for progressive neurological conditions? 
Are there any contraindications for use of a delegated care model for these supports with 
this population (e.g. using therapy assistants)? 
What are the risks and contraindications of physiotherapy and exercise physiology based on 
disease progression with these populations (i.e. is there a time when hands on therapy 
should not be provided as risks outweigh benefits)? 
Date: 29/4/2024 
Requestor: s47F - personal privacy 
Endorsed by: Shannon A
 
s47F - persona  
Researcher: Aaron Hs47F - personal priva 
Cleared by: Aaron Hs47F - personal priva 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 1 of 14 
OFFICIAL 
Page 1 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
1.  Contents 
Physiotherapy and Exercise physiology for progressive neurological conditions ....................... 1 
1. 
Contents ....................................................................................................................... 2 
2. 
Summary ...................................................................................................................... 3 
3. 
Previous TAPIB research .............................................................................................. 3 
4. 
Therapy assistants ........................................................................................................ 4 
5. 
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / motor neuron disease ................................................... 5 
5.1  Frequency and duration ............................................................................................. 5 
5.2  Risks .......................................................................................................................... 5 
5.3  Stage of progression .................................................................................................. 5 
6. 
Parkinson’s Disease ..................................................................................................... 6 
6.1  Frequency and duration ............................................................................................. 6 
6.2  Risks .......................................................................................................................... 7 
6.3  Stage of progression .................................................................................................. 8 
7. 
Multiple Sclerosis .......................................................................................................... 8 
7.1  Frequency and duration ............................................................................................. 8 
7.2  Risks .......................................................................................................................... 9 
7.3  Stage of progression ................................................................................................ 10 
8. 
Muscular dystrophy ..................................................................................................... 10 
8.1  Frequency and duration ........................................................................................... 10 
8.2  Risks ........................................................................................................................ 11 
8.3  Stage of progression ................................................................................................ 11 
9. 
References ................................................................................................................. 11 
 
 
 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 2 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 2 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
2.  Summary 
This paper considers the use of physiotherapy and exercise interventions for people with 
progressive neurological conditions including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and motor 
neuron disease (MND), Parkinson’s disease (PD), multiple sclerosis (MS), and muscular 
dystrophy (MD). This paper focusses on evidence of optimal frequency and duration of 
physiotherapy and exercise interventions, risks associated with interventions, differing care for 
early or late stages of progression and the use of therapy assistants through a delegated care 
model. 
No studies were found that address the role of therapy assistants in the delivery of 
physiotherapy or exercise interventions for people with progressive neurological conditions. 
Some evidence suggests that the use of therapy assistants in acute hospital settings and 
general community settings is safe and effective. This evidence is uncertain and further 
research is required. 
There is limited evidence regarding optimal dosage of physiotherapy and exercise 
interventions for people with progressive neurological conditions. Clinical practice guidelines 
for PD and MS provided recommendations for frequency and duration of physiotherapy and 
exercise interventions. However, it is likely that these recommendations are based primarily on 
clinical judgement rather than published evidence. One 2023 systematic review was able to 
determine that at least twice weekly sessions of more than 40 minutes is an effective dose of 
exercise intervention for the improvement of balance in MS (Corrini et al, 2023). No other 
studies could provide evidence-based dosage recommendations. 
Where evidence is not clear, guidelines generally recommend that type, frequency, duration 
and intensity of physiotherapy or exercise interventions should be determined individually 
based on the needs and preferences of the person receiving treatment. 
Despite some issues with the proper reporting of adverse events in experimental studies, 
exercise interventions for people with progressive neurological conditions are generally 
believed to be safe, provided that standard safety precautions are observed. 
There is little evidence regarding safety and effectiveness of physiotherapy and exercise 
interventions for people at late stages of progressive neurological conditions. Most research 
focusses on people with mild to moderate symptom severity. 
3.  Previous TAPIB research 
Other relevant TAPIB research papers include: 
•  RES 322 Manual therapy to address neuromusculoskeletal function 
•  RES 321 Osteopathy 
•  RES 318 Exercise physiology and stroke 
•  RES 289 Lokomat Therapy 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 3 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 3 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
•  RES 264 Chiropractic 
•  RES 233 Virtual reality as a support tool 
•  RES 191 Massage Therapy as a Treatment for Multiple Sclerosis 
4.  Therapy assistants 
Therapy assistants are 
support staff who complete clinical and non-clinical tasks under the supervision and 
delegation of an allied health professional. Clinical tasks include any direct therapeutic 
interventions provided to patients such as exercise therapy and education, while non-
clinical tasks may include administration duties (eg, completing paperwork for 
equipment hire), maintenance of equipment and cleaning the clinical environment. 
Because al ied health assistants cannot perform clinical tasks that involve diagnosing or 
assessing patient health conditions, allied health professionals must perform a 
comprehensive assessment of the patient and prescribe appropriate therapy prior to 
delegating the allied health assistant to perform any clinical tasks. (Snowdon et al, 2024, 
p.2). 
In a survey of 232 UK-based physiotherapists, 81% of respondents indicated that they at least 
sometimes delegate the supervision of prescribed exercises to therapy assistants 
(Sarigiovannis et al, 2022). The authors also found that delegation of clinical tasks to therapy 
assistants was more likely in less complex cases where there is a straightforward treatment 
plan. There is a perception that increased reliance on therapy assistants may compromise the 
quality or safety of the intervention (Snowdon et al, 2024). However, existing evidence 
suggests that physiotherapy or exercise interventions delivered by a therapy assistant are 
likely safe (Lau et al, 2024; Snowdon et al, 2020). 
No studies were found that address the role of therapy assistants in the delivery of 
physiotherapy or exercise interventions for people with progressive neurological conditions. 
Where there is minimal research to date, there is a growing interest in the role of therapy 
assistants in completing clinical physiotherapy tasks (Snowdon et al, 2024; Sarigiovannis et al, 
2023). Current research mostly considers the addition of therapy assistants to usual care 
rather than a model where physiotherapy or exercise interventions are primarily delivered by a 
therapy assistant (Snowdon et al, 2024; Lau et al, 2024; Snowdon et al, 2020). Some evidence 
points to the efficacy and safety of physiotherapy or exercise interventions delivered by 
therapy assistants. Additional supervised exercise sessions may improve outcomes regardless 
of whether it is delivered by a physiotherapist or therapy assistant (Snowdon et al, 2024; Lau 
et al, 2024; Baumann et al, 2023a-b; Sarigiovannis et al, 2023; Sarigiovannis et al, 2022; 
Sarigiovannis et al, 2021). Much of the research is based in a hospital setting and the roles of 
physiotherapist and therapy assistant are frequently poorly reported, so results may not 
generalise across all models of therapy assistance or patient cohorts (Sarigiovannis et al, 
2021; Snowdon et al, 2020). 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 4 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 4 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
5.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis / motor neuron disease 
5.1  Frequency and duration 
We did not find any reviews able to determine optimal frequency or duration of exercise or 
physiotherapy interventions for people with ALS/MND. One review (Zhou et al, 2022) showed 
inconsistent evidence that more intensive exercise training could slow the decline in functional 
capacity. However, the authors do not specify what they mean by ‘intensive’. 
A 2023 meta-analysis including 17 studies was unable to determine optimal exercise dosage 
due to the variability of intervention: “frequency ranged from 2×/week to 3×/day, up to 7 
days/week, with repetitions of sets ranging from 20 to 25, intensity ranging from 30 to 60% of a 
patient’s maximum value, and treatment duration ranging from 2 weeks to 2 years” (Donohue 
et al, 2023, p.19). Meng et al (2020) and Papadopolou et al (2024) were similarly unable to 
determine the most effective frequency, intensity, type, timing or duration of exercise-based 
interventions. 
5.2  Risks 
Researchers report some reluctance to prescribe exercise for people with ALS/MND due to 
possibility that exercise might lead to fatigue and faster progression of symptoms (MND 
Australia, 2021). However, recent reviews have found no serious adverse events in studies of 
exercise or physiotherapy intervention for people with ALS/MND (Papadopolou et al, 2024; 
Donohue et al, 2023; Meng et al, 2020). Researchers suggest that physiotherapy or exercise-
based interventions are likely safe for people with ALS/MND. 
5.3  Stage of progression 
Minimal evidence is available for the efficacy of physiotherapy or exercise programs for people 
with more advanced ALS/MND. Donahue et al (2023) find some low certainty evidence that 
exercise programs are beneficial in early stages of disease progression. However, all of the 
studies included in their review explore exercise intervention only on those with low to 
moderate symptom severity. 
Ireland’s Guidelines for the physiotherapy management of Motor Neuron Disease 
(O’Callaghan, 2014), suggests physiotherapy treatment plans differentiate early, middle and 
late stages of progression. During the late stage, strategies to maintain function and manage 
symptoms may include: 
•  a stretching program 
•  active and passive range of movement exercises 
•  the use of assistive technology such as motomed or tilt table. 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 5 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 5 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
While evidence is presented for the efficacy of exercise at the early stages of MND, 
recommendations for strategies at the middle and late stages are based on clinical judgment 
of the authors. 
6.  Parkinson’s Disease 
6.1  Frequency and duration 
There is no consensus on optimal frequency or duration of physiotherapy or exercise 
interventions for people with Parkinson’s disease. Reviews report average frequency and 
duration of interventions used in studies but are unable to determine best practice timing 
(Ernst et al, 2024; El Hayek et al, 2023; Osborne et al, 2022; Grimes et al, 2019; NICE, 2017; 
Keus et al, 2014). 
El Hayek et al (2023) reviewed 46 studies to determine most effective types, timing, frequency, 
duration, and outcomes of physiotherapy and exercise for people with Parkinson’s disease. 
They found no significant difference between interventions and comparisons for frequency, 
duration or number of sessions. 
A 2024 Cochrane review of studies on exercise intervention for people with Parkinson’s 
disease was unable to draw conclusions regarding the optimal frequency of exercise 
intervention (Ernst et al ,2024). The authors observed a beneficial effect on functional mobility 
and balance in studies lasting longer than 12 weeks. However, they did not observe a 
significant effect of intervention duration on other outcomes. 
Of four clinical practice guidelines that recommend the use of physiotherapy, exercise or 
physical activity for people with Parkinson’s disease, only one provides recommendations 
regarding frequency and duration of activity (Osborne et al, 2022; Grimes et al, 2019; NICE, 
2017; Keus et al, 2014). The European Physiotherapy Guideline for Parkinson’s Disease 
(Keus et al, 2014) includes recommendations for minimum treatment period for seven 
physiotherapy modalities (refer to Table 1). However, the Guideline Development Group 
(GDG) responsible for the recommendations also note: 
Evidence-based information on the optimal number of sessions a week, session time 
and length of a treatment period are unavailable. These decisions wil  depend on the 
treatment goal, the selected intervention, the potential of the [person with Parkinson’s 
disease] and the response to the treatment. GDG recommendations for minimum 
treatment period, frequency and session duration for each intervention category 
provided in this chapter are based on the averages of controlled clinical trials (CCTs) 
supportive to the ‘for’ recommendations (Keus et al, 2014, p.64) 
Further, the GDG suggests that the optimal treatment period, duration and intensity will most 
likely never be determined due to the varied fitness levels, functional capacity and preferences 
of people with Parkinson’s disease (Keus et al, 2014, p.72). This judgement is implicitly 
supported by the most recent clinical guideline from the American Physical Therapy 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 6 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 6 of 14




FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
reported a more significant rate of adverse effects in the intervention group compared to the 
control group. 
6.3  Stage of progression 
Li et al (2023) suggest that exercise interventions are beneficial for people at advanced stages 
of Parkinson’s disease to maintain function and health. However, this suggestion was not 
based on the results of their review, which found no evidence that exercise could limit 
progression of symptoms for people at advanced stages. 
Other reviews have also been unable to determine whether exercise interventions are effective 
or safe for people at advanced at stages of Parkinson’s progression (stages 4 or 5 of the 
Hoehn & Yahr scale). Ernst et al (2024) reviewed 154 studies and found most studies included 
participants at stages 1 – 3. No studies included participants at stage 5, while only 17 studies 
included participants at stage 4. Therefore, the authors note that their results may not apply to 
people at advanced stages of Parkinson’s disease progression. 
For most physiotherapy interventions reviewed by Osborne et al (2022), studies supporting the 
intervention focussed on mostly those with mild to moderate symptoms covering Hoehn & 
Yahr stages 1 to 3. Studies investigating external cueing and resistance, balance and flexibility 
training included participants at stages 1 to 4. None of the recommendations made by 
Osborne et al are relevant to people showing advanced stage 5 symptoms. 
7.  Multiple Sclerosis 
7.1  Frequency and duration 
A 2019 systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for exercise interventions for people 
with Multiple Sclerosis found consistent dosage recommendations for aerobic and resistance 
training: 
The literature we summarized consistently indicated that moderate-intensity aerobic 
training should be performed 2 to 3 days per week in 10- to 40-minute bouts. By 
achieving these guidelines, people with MS can potentially improve their cardiovascular 
fitness, mobility and symptoms of fatigue and depression. This should be complemented 
by 2 to 3 days of weekly resistance training, from which anticipated benefits could 
include: improved strength, balance, mobility, performance of activities of daily living, 
and symptoms of fatigue (Kim et al, 2019, p.9). 
These recommendations may be based on a combination of experimental evidence and 
clinical judgement. However, considering the difficulty of deriving optimal dosage levels from 
the current evidence, it is likely that the recommendations in Kim et al represent a professional 
consensus rather than an evidence-based conclusion (Taul-Madsen et al, 2021; Edwards & 
Pilutti, 2017). 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 8 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 8 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
Corrini et al (2023) reviewed 20 randomised controlled trials looking at the effect of balance 
training programs for people with Multiple Sclerosis. They found high quality evidence that 
physiotherapy targeting balance has a moderate effect on improving balance as measured by 
the Berg Balance Scale. In addition, their meta-analysis was able to show that sessions lasting 
40 minutes or longer produced a significant and clinically meaningful improvement in balance 
scores, while sessions lasting under 40 minutes did not produce statistically significant results. 
The authors concluded that: 
intense treatments lasting at least 40 [minutes] were associated with a better and more 
clinically meaningful improvement, and greater results can be reached when 
rehabilitation is provided over a short period (duration) and for a few sessions per week 
(frequency) (Corrini et al, 2023, p.20). 
7.2  Risks 
Learmonth et al (2023) searched for information on relapse and adverse events after exercise 
interventions for people with Multiple Sclerosis. They reviewed 40 randomised controlled trials 
including 1780 participants. The authors found no significant difference in adverse events 
between exercise intervention and comparison groups. The analysis 
did not reveal any significant variability in risk of exercise training across the potentially 
important factors of exercise type, delivery style (e.g. supervised, independent or 
remotely supervised), participant disability level or the prescription of exercise consistent 
with minimal exercise guidelines for persons with MS (Learmonth, 2023, p.1624). 
While exercise interventions are generally considered safe for people with Multiple Sclerosis, 
safety precautions and modifications may be required depending on the needs of the 
individual. A 2019 systematic review of guidelines produced the following advice: 
An exercise prescription for people with MS should promote a safe and individualized 
exercise regimen. Thus, before prescribing an exercise routine, MS specific 
symptoms/characteristics (i.e., fatigue and heat sensitivity) should be identified and 
discussed, and the exercise prescription should include appropriate modifications. For 
example, individuals with high heat sensitivity should exercise in a cool environment, 
and a cooling fan should be readily available for the person during the exercise 
sessions. When individuals experience symptom exacerbation, either daily variation in 
symptoms or relapse, the exercise program may require modification or be temporarily 
discontinued until the symptoms are stable. Risk of falling should be considered for 
individuals with MS, and individuals with high risk of falls should perform both aerobic 
and strength exercises in a seated position (e.g., recumbent bike, weight machines) and 
under supervision (Kim et al, 2019, p.6) 
 
 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 9 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 9 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
7.3  Stage of progression 
Learmonth et al (2023) did not find any significant difference in risk or safety of exercise 
interventions between levels of disability. However, it should also be noted that participants 
with advanced stages of MS were minimally represented in the studies reviewed. Of 40 
randomised controlled trials, only 3 were focussed on people with severe symptoms of Multiple 
Sclerosis. In fact, most evidence for the efficacy of exercise intervention for people with 
Multiple Sclerosis lacks generalisability for people with severe symptoms (Corrini et al, 2023; 
Taul-Madsen et al, 2021; Kim et al, 2019; Edwards & Pilutti, 2017). 
Two systematic reviews have examined the effectiveness of physiotherapy or exercise 
interventions in people with Multiple Sclerosis (Binshalan et al, 2022; Edwards & Pilutti, 2017). 
A 2017 review found limited and very low certainty evidence that exercise interventions could 
improve fitness, function, balance, fatigue, mood and quality of life (Edwards & Pilutti, 2017). 
The authors also suggest exercise interventions are safe for people with severe symptoms. 
More recently, Binshalan et al (2022) found low quality evidence that robot assisted gait 
therapy may be effective at improving walking speed and endurance in people with severe 
symptoms of Multiple Sclerosis. The authors speculate on possible reasons robot assisted gait 
therapy may be more effective than other modes of physiotherapy or exercise intervention: 
Appropriate PT intervention programs must be tailored to the patient’s abilities with 
sufficient stimulus to push present competence to produce effect [49]. Therefore, it 
possible that RAGT is less demanding for severely disabled pwMS, who might not be 
able to complete other forms of PT effectively (p.13). 
8.  Muscular dystrophy 
8.1  Frequency and duration 
Hammer et al (2022) is the most recent systematic review of physiotherapy or exercise 
interventions for people with muscular dystrophy. They reviewed 12 studies with 282 
participants and found exercise intervention may improve strength and endurance for people 
with MD. No conclusions regarding frequency, duration or intensity were possible with the 
available evidence. 
A 2019 Cochrane review of exercise training in muscle disease (including MD), notes: 
The most effective dose of exercise for people with muscle diseases is currently 
unknown, making it difficult to prescribe exercise in this population. This is reflected in 
the large variation in the frequency, duration and intensity of exercise prescribed (Voet 
et al, 2019, p.42). 
 
 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 10 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 10 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
8.2  Risks 
The most recent review of physiotherapy or exercise interventions for MD noted that none of 
the studies included in the review adequately reported on adverse events. However, the 
authors noted that “intensive eccentric muscle exercise, where the muscle is both activated 
and lengthened, in addition to high-resistance exercise, may exacerbate muscle damage and 
should be avoided” (Hammer et al, 2022, p.2). 
Voet et al (2019) report no evidence of safety concerns in appropriately structured exercise 
programmes, though they also note that “included studies were small and the evidence was 
largely low or low certainty; therefore, we can make no definitive statements regarding safety” 
(p.42). 
8.3  Stage of progression 
No studies were able to discriminate benefits or risks of exercise based on severity of 
symptoms or stage of progression. 
9.  References 
Binshalan, T., Nair, K. P. S., & McNeil , A. (2022). The Effectiveness of Physiotherapy 
Interventions for Mobility in Severe Multiple Sclerosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-
Analysis. Multiple sclerosis international, 2022, 2357785. 
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/2357785 
Baumann, A. N., Curtis, D. P., Chen, M., & Baldwin, K. D. (2023a). The Impact of the Addition 
of a Physical Therapy Assistant to the Treatment Team for Management of Neck Pain: 
A Retrospective Analysis of Outpatient Physical Therapy Clinics. Cureus15(7), 
e42751. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42751 
Baumann, A. N., Indermuhle, T., Oleson, C. J., Callaghan, M. E., Rogers, H., Pennacchio, C., 
Baldwin, K. D., & Leland, J. M., 3rd (2023b). Clinical Outcomes Associated With the 
Addition of a Physical Therapist Assistant to a Rehabilitation Team When Treating 
Musculoskeletal Shoulder Pain in the Outpatient Setting: A Retrospective Cohort Study. 
Cureus15(7), e42680. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.42680 
Corrini, C., Gervasoni, E., Perini, G., Cosentino, C., Putzolu, M., Montesano, A., Pelosin, E., 
Prosperini, L., & Cattaneo, D. (2023). Mobility and balance rehabilitation in multiple 
sclerosis: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Multiple sclerosis and 
related disorders
, 69, 104424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2022.104424 
Edwards, T., & Pilutti, L. A. (2017). The effect of exercise training in adults with multiple 
sclerosis with severe mobility disability: A systematic review and future research 
directions. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 16, 31–39. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2017.06.003 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 11 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 11 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
El Hayek, M., Lobo Jofili Lopes, J. L. M., LeLaurin, J. H., Gregory, M. E., Abi Nehme, A. M., 
McCall-Junkin, P., Au, K. L. K., Okun, M. S., & Sal oum, R. G. (2023). Type, Timing, 
Frequency, and Durability of Outcome of Physical Therapy for Parkinson Disease: A 
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. JAMA network open6(7), e2324860. 
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.24860 
Ernst, M., Folkerts, A. K., Gol an, R., Lieker, E., Caro-Valenzuela, J., Adams, A., Cryns, N., 
Monsef, I., Dresen, A., Roheger, M., Eggers, C., Skoetz, N., & Kalbe, E. (2024). 
Physical exercise for people with Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and network 
meta-analysis. The Cochrane database of systematic reviews4(4), CD013856. 
https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD013856.pub3 
Grimes, D., Fitzpatrick, M., Gordon, J., Miyasaki, J., Fon, E. A., Schlossmacher, M., 
Suchowersky, O., Rajput, A., Lafontaine, A. L., Mestre, T., Appel-Cresswell, S., Kalia, 
S. K., Schoffer, K., Zurowski, M., Postuma, R. B., Udow, S., Fox, S., Barbeau, P., & 
Hutton, B. (2019). Canadian guideline for Parkinson disease. CMAJ : Canadian Medical 
Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne
191(36), E989–
E1004. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.181504 
Hammer, S., Toussaint, M., Vol sæter, M., Nesbjørg Tvedt, M., Drange Røksund, O., Reychler, 
G., Lund, H., & Andersen, T. (2022). Exercise Training in Duchenne Muscular 
Dystrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of rehabilitation medicine
54, jrm00250. https://doi.org/10.2340/jrm.v53.985 
Keus, S., Munneke, M., Graziano, M., Paltamaa, J., Pelosin, E., Domingos, J., ... & Bloem, B. 
(2014). European physiotherapy guideline for Parkinson’s disease. The Netherlands: 
KNGF/ParkinsonNet. 
Kim, Y., Lai, B., Mehta, T., Thirumalai, M., Padalabalanarayanan, S., Rimmer, J. H., & Motl, R. 
W. (2019). Exercise Training Guidelines for Multiple Sclerosis, Stroke, and Parkinson 
Disease: Rapid Review and Synthesis. American journal of physical medicine & 
rehabilitation
98(7), 613–621. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001174 
Kyriakatis, G. M., Lykou, P. M., Dimitriadis, Z., & Besios, T. (2023). Efficacy of remote exercise 
and physiotherapy programs on depressive symptoms in people with multiple sclerosis - 
A systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple sclerosis and related disorders, 79, 
105067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msard.2023.105067 
Lau, B., March, M. K., Harmer, A. R., Caruana, S., Mahony, C., & Dennis, S. (2024). 
Experiences of Boosting Inpatient Exercise After HipFracture Surgery Using An 
Alternative Workforce - A Qualitative Study. BMC geriatrics24(1), 183. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-024-04756-1 
Learmonth, Y. C., P Herring, M., Russel , D. I., Pilutti, L. A., Day, S., Marck, C. H., Chan, B., 
Metse, A. P., & Motl, R. W. (2023). Safety of exercise training in multiple sclerosis: An 
updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Multiple sclerosis (Houndmil s, 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 12 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 12 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
Basingstoke, England)29(13), 1604–1631. 
https://doi.org/10.1177/13524585231204459 
Meng, L., Li, X., Li, C., Tsang, R. C., Chen, Y., Ge, Y., & Gao, Q. (2020). Effects of exercise in 
patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. 
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation99(9), 801-810. 
https://doi.org/10.1097/PHM.0000000000001419 
Motor Neuron Disease Australia. (2021). Physical Activity and MND
https://www.mndaustralia.org.au/mnd-connect/information-resources/physical-activity-
and-mnd 
National Institute of Health and Care Excellence. (2017). Parkinson’s disease in adults: 
diagnosis and management [NG71]. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng71 
O’Callaghan, G., Murray, D. & Vance, R. (2014). Guidelines for the physiotherapy 
management of Motor Neuron Disease. Irish Hospice Foundation. 
https://d2khofxhx95v1k.cloudfront.net/b1fdb917f1fea268a7a1b7b502dcd172.pdf 
Osborne, J. A., Botkin, R., Colon-Semenza, C., DeAngelis, T. R., Gallardo, O. G., Kosakowski, 
H., Martel o, J., Pradhan, S., Rafferty, M., Readinger, J. L., Whitt, A. L., & El is, T. D. 
(2022). Physical Therapist Management of Parkinson Disease: A Clinical Practice 
Guideline From the American Physical Therapy Association. Physical therapy102(4), 
pzab302. https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/pzab302 
Papadopoulou, M., Papapostolou, A., Dimakopoulos, R., Salakou, S., Koropouli, E., 
Fanouraki, S., Bakola, E., Moschovos, C., & Tsivgoulis, G. (2024). Non-
Pharmacological Interventions on Pain in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Patients: A 
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland)12(7), 770. 
https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12070770 
Sarigiovannis, P., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S., & Saunders, B. (2023). Developing a best practice 
framework for musculoskeletal outpatient physiotherapy delegation: the MOPeD mixed-
methods research study protocol. BMJ open13(3), e072989. 
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072989  
Sarigiovannis, P., Foster, N. E., Jowett, S., & Saunders, B. (2022). Delegation of workload 
from musculoskeletal physiotherapists to physiotherapy assistants/support workers: A 
UK online survey. Musculoskeletal science & practice, 62, 102631. 
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102631 
Sarigiovannis, P., Jowett, S., Saunders, B., Corp, N., & Bishop, A. (2021). Delegation by Al ied 
Health Professionals to Al ied Health Assistants: a mixed methods systematic review. 
Physiotherapy, 112, 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2020.10.002 
Snowdon, D. A., Wang, Y. T., Cal isaya, M. L., Col yer, T. A., Jol iffe, L., Johns, N., Vincent, P., 
Pragash, N., & Taylor, N. F. (2024). Staying Active with Multimorbidity In Acute hospital 
settings (StAMInA) trial: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial of al ied 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 13 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 13 of 14


FOI 24/25-0223 
Research paper 
Document 2
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
health assistant mobility rehabilitation for patients with multimorbidity. BMJ open14(1), 
e078843. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078843 
Snowdon, D. A., King, O. A., Dennett, A., Pinson, J. A., Shannon, M. M., Collyer, T. A., Davis, 
A., & Wil iams, C. M. (2022). Delegation of patient related tasks to allied health 
assistants: a time motion study. BMC health services research22(1), 1280. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-022-08642-7 
Snowdon, D. A., Vincent, P., Cal isaya, M. L., Col yer, T. A., Wang, Y. T., & Taylor, N. F. 
(2021). Feasibility of allied health assistant management of people with acute hip 
fracture: protocol for a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ open11(11), 
e054298. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-054298 
Snowdon, D. A., Storr, B., Davis, A., Taylor, N. F., & Wil iams, C. M. (2020). The effect of 
delegation of therapy to allied health assistants on patient and organisational outcomes: 
a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC health services research20(1), 491. 
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05312-4 
Taul-Madsen, L., Connolly, L., Dennett, R., Freeman, J., Dalgas, U., & Hvid, L. G. (2021). Is 
Aerobic or Resistance Training the Most Effective Exercise Modality for Improving 
Lower Extremity Physical Function and Perceived Fatigue in People With Multiple 
Sclerosis? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Archives of physical medicine and 
rehabilitation
102(10), 2032–2048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2021.03.026 
Voet, N. B., van der Kooi, E. L., van Engelen, B. G., & Geurts, A. C. (2019). Strength training 
and aerobic exercise training for muscle disease. The Cochrane database of systematic 
reviews
12(12), CD003907. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003907.pub5 
Zhou, B., Wei, J., Zhang, Y., Liu, Y., Shan, S., Ye, S., Li, B., Fan, D., & Luo, Y. (2022). 
Different observation period of exercise training in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis 
patients: A meta-analysis. Frontiers in neurology, 13, 986882. 
https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.986882 
 
 
Physio and exercise for progressive conditions 
Page 14 of 14  
OFFICIAL 
Page 14 of 14