(page 6)
Unsurprisingly, the OAIC was totally opaque and unaccountable.
I am not aware I gave consent for a change of address for notices, and given Right to Know is where the request was made, the address for notices wo...
Hi Everyone,
Ben here, one of the volunteers that look after the site. Just a reminder that the purpose of annotations are to help people with reques...
Thank you for your response to my administrative access request (AAR).
As I explicitly made my request as an AAR, I believe para 1.46 of the Infor...
I acknowledge your decision of today, which made slight reduction of the a few of the previous many redactions.
As stated in the scope of this FOI...
Dear Ned,
As this FOI had documents excluded in the FOI decision, it should be marked “Partially Successful” rather than “Successful”.
“Successful”...
Dear FOI applicant
Thank you for your comments in relation to the Information Publication
Scheme (IPS) survey. I have passed your comments on to t...
Our reference: MR18/00435
Dear Anonymous
Thank you for your response.
This matter is now considered withdrawn under s 54R of the Freedom of
Info...
Our reference: FOIREQ18/00032
Dear Mr Duncan
Please find attached the decision of today’s date.
Kind regards
Shelley Napper | Review and Invest...
Dear FOI applicant
I refer to your request for access to documents under the Freedom of
Information Act 1982 (Cth) (the FOI Act), received by th...
I’ve marked this partial for two reasons:
1) Firstly, this information should have been provided a month ago with the original FOI decision, but was u...
The subsequent FOI the OAIC forced me to put in, after unethically and unlawfully redacting relevant information for which no consent was given to reda...
Dear Anonymous
The delegate’s FOI decision and the requested document are attached to
this email.
Regards
Enquiries Officer
Office of the Aust...
Dear Ms Pane
A decision on your FOI request is attached, as are the documents you
requested.
Regards
Raewyn Harlock | Assistant...
On 1 June 2017, under FOIREQ17/00036, I made a valid FOI Request (administrative access sought in the first instance, but to be treated as an FOI Ap...
Dear Ms Pane,
I am writing to provide you with my decision on your Internal Review application for your FOI request relating to the Information Commis...
Thank you for the background information. I am satisfied with the response here that no documents exist as the OAIC (in its current form) has never...
I make this note only for a purpose to make something clear to other users of Right to Know. In the first email the applicant mentions "s 17 FOI reques...
Thank you for your decision, the information provided is quite useful, and will be a beneficial aid to interpretation when the Australian National A...
Our reference: MR17/00242
Dear Ms Pane
MR17/00242 – Finalisation of your application for IC review
I refer to your application for IC...
You claim the reporting system cannot generate the information requested for those privacy complaints exceeding 360 days, yet this is contradicted b...
Dear Ms Pane
A decision and the documents you requested on 22 April 2017 are attached
to this email.
Regards
Raewyn Harlock | Assist...
Thank you for your email.
I am out of the office on Friday 19 May 2017 and will return on Monday 22
May 2017. I will respond to you then.
...
Our Reference: FOIREQ17/00014
Dear Mr Tonoli,
Please find attached the decision in relation to your FOI request.
Kind Regards,
...
Thank you for your reply.
Like the OAIC I do not have concerns regarding the addition of watermarks, FOI reference numbers, or page numbers to doc...
Only requests made using Right to Know are shown.
?