This person's Freedom of Information requests (approximately 5)
*UPDATE 21 Jan 2020: THE END*
On 20 December 2019, the AAT overturned the Information Commissioner’s ruling that the letters must be handed over to m...
After a discussion about this with Melbourne City Council and some additional personal research it turns out, rather bizarrely, that in 2014 the Victor...
UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Mr Summers
Please find attached correspondence relating to your FOI request with the
Department of Prime Minister and Cabine...
Our reference: RQ17/00561
Agency reference: FOI/2017/004
Mr William Summers
By email: [1][FOI #2934 email]
Dear Mr Summers
Extension of t...
UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Mr Summers
Please find attached the decision of the Department of the Prime Minister
and Cabinet in relation to your FOI req...
This person's 9 annotations
*UPDATE 21 Jan 2020: THE END*
On 20 December 2019, the AAT overturned the Information Commissioner’s ruling that the letters must be handed over to m...
After a discussion about this with Melbourne City Council and some additional personal research it turns out, rather bizarrely, that in 2014 the Victor...
Is the requester going to take this any further with a complaint to the Info Commissioner?
The grounds for withholding are very weak.
I am not su...
This departmental response is desperate.
S37 is specifically about breaches of the law: none have been suggested in this case, at least not publicly...
LETTER SUBMITTED TO THE OAIC (POSTED HERE FOR INFO ONLY):
I write regarding my request to the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet (DPMC...
Note: Following a complaint to the Information Commissioner's Office (OAIC) about the very delayed response time, I am now continuing this case directl...
Graham, If you aren't going to do anything more to pursue this request (which is probably fruitless), you might as well take the information they offer...
Graeme, good on you for appealing. You really need to come up with specific reasons for why you think their initial response is wrong though.
I have...
You should appeal.
The reasons given for this being against the public interest seem very weak. Some of this strikes me as very dubious:
“The effe...