This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Indigenous Participation Plans & Evaluation for SON4076897 (AGSV External Vetting Panel)'.


735/24/25
CLF
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear CLF,
NOTIFICATION OF A REQUEST CONSULTATION PROCESS – FOI 735/24/25
I refer to your request for access to the following documents, in the possession of the Department of 
Defence (Defence) under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (Cth) (FOI Act). 
I am an officer authorised under section 23(1) of the FOI Act to make decisions in relation to FOI 
requests. 
I am writing to tell you that I believe that the work involved in processing your request in its current 
form would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of this agency from its other 
operations due to its size and broad scope. This is called a ‘practical refusal reason’ (section 24AA). 
On this basis, I intend to refuse your request. However, before I make a final decision to do this, you 
have an opportunity to revise your request. This is called a ‘request consultation process’ as set out 
under section 24AB of the FOI Act. You have 14 days to respond to this notice in one of the ways set 
out below.
Reason for Intending to Refuse Your Request
In your request, you sought documents relating to:
… the Indigenous participation commitments and evaluation process for Standing Offer 
Notice (SON4076897), which awarded contracts to the following prime contractors:

Barrington Corporate Risk Pty Limited (ABN: 54 101 991 584) Cogent Business Solutions Pty 
Ltd (ABN: 44 076 633 200) Connect3i Pty Ltd (ABN: 39 621 200 637) Ernst & Young (ABN: 75 
288 172 749) Mitchell Personnel Solutions Pty Ltd (ABN: 53 118 343 801) Omni Executive Pty 
Ltd (ABN: 31 160 925 413) Sirras Consultants Pty Ltd (ABN: 68 619 212 234) Staff Check Pty 
Limited (ABN: 99 107 014 942) Requested Documents I seek access to:

All Indigenous Participation Plans submitted by the above-listed prime contractors as part of 
their bid for SON4076897, detailing how they proposed to meet Indigenous Procurement 
Policy (IPP) and Mandatory Minimum Requirements (MMRs).
Documents outlining how the Department of Defence evaluated Indigenous participation in 
these bids, including:
Any scoring criteria, weighting, or assessment frameworks used to evaluate Indigenous 
engagement.
Any internal assessment reports or scoring matrices relating to the Indigenous participation 
component.
Records of communication between the Department of Defence, AGSVA, and the prime 
contractors regarding the Indigenous participation component of the contract.
Any directives, policy guidelines, or memos issued by the Department of Defence regarding 
how Indigenous participation would be assessed and enforced post-award.



For the purpose of providing this notice, I have considered whether processing your request would 
be unreasonable. I consider that processing your request, as it currently stands, would be 
unreasonable because the work involved in processing your request in its current form would 
substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the agency from its other operations. 
Section 24(1) of the FOI Act provides that an agency may refuse to give access to documents in 
accordance with an FOI request if:  
•  a practical refusal reason exists in relation to the request; and  
•  following a request consultation process under section 24AB of the FOI Act, the agency is 
satisfied that the practical refusal reason still exists.  
Section 24AA(1)(a)(i) of the FOI Act provides that a practical refusal reason exists in relation to an FOI 
request if the work involved in processing the request would substantially and unreasonably divert 
the resources of the department from its other operations. 
I find that a significant amount of resources would have to be diverted to arrange for the in scope 
material to undergo initial review, and finally to undertake the decision making process in regard to 
the information that meets the parameters of your request. 
Searches for your request have identified over 1000 documents, meaning that allowing an average of 
two pages per document, 2000 pages would be required to be carefully reviewed and considered 
prior to release. Using a conservative estimate of five minutes to review and make a decision on each 
page, it would take the decision maker in excess of 166 hours to make their decision on access. 
Request Consultation Process 
You now have an opportunity to revise your request to enable Defence to process it.  
Revising your request can mean narrowing the scope of the request to make it more manageable or 
explaining in more detail the documents you wish to access. For example, by providing more specific 
information about exactly what documents you are interested in, Defence will be able to pinpoint 
the documents more quickly and avoid using excessive resources to process documents you are not 
interested in.  
Before the end of the consultation period, you must do one of the following, in writing:  
x  Withdraw your request  
x  Make a revised request  
x  Tell us that you do not wish to revise your request.  
The consultation period starts on the day after you receive this notice and ends on 2 April 2025.  
If you revise your request in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined 
above, we will recommence processing it. (Please note that the time taken to consult you regarding 
the scope of your request is not taken into account for the purposes of the 30 day time limit for 
processing your request.) 
In consideration of submitting a revised request, I suggest that you may wish to limit your request to 
the Individual Participant Plans for the contractors listed in your current scope of request:  
x  Barrington Corporate Risk Pty Limited (ABN: 54 101 991 584)  
x  Cogent Business Solutions Pty Ltd (ABN: 44 076 633 200)  
x  Connect3i Pty Ltd (ABN: 39 621 200 637)  
x  Ernst & Young (ABN: 75 288 172 749)  
x  Mitchell Personnel Solutions Pty Ltd (ABN: 53 118 343 801)  


x  Omni Executive Pty Ltd (ABN: 31 160 925 413)  
x  Sirras Consultants Pty Ltd (ABN: 68 619 212 234)  
x  Staff Check Pty Limited (ABN: 99 107 014 942)  
 
If you do not do one of the three things listed above during the consultation period your request will 
be taken to have been withdrawn. 
Contact Officer  
If you would like to revise your request or have any questions, please contact the Case Manager by 
email, xxx.xxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx. 
Yours sincerely,  
simonbuckley Digitally signed by simonbuckley 
Date: 2025.03.19 10:14:48 +08'00'
Simon Buckley   
SES Band 1 
Assistant Secretary Security Policy and Services 
 
Department of Defence  
Russell Offices  
PO Box 7910  
Canberra BC ACT 2610 
19 March 2025