This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Breakdown of costs associated with the NDIS Review'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-1105 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
6 March 2025 
ndis.gov.au 
Mark Pietsch  
Right to Know 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Dear Mark Pietsch 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
Thank you for your correspondence of 14 January 2025, in which you requested access to 
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of 
Information Act 1982
 (FOI Act). 
Scope of your request 
You have requested access to the fol owing documents: 
“…1. Internal emails, memos, or directives sent to or from the senior NDIA staff internally 
or externally between January 2022 and present that reference: 
"Growth Targets" 
"Growth Caps" 
"Cost Savings" 
in relation to NDIS participant numbers, scheme cost or plan utlilisation. 
2. Minutes of meetings, briefing notes, or reports prepared for or by senior NDIA
executives that discuss:
Strategies to manage participant growth
Measures to cap funding growth
Cost-saving initiatives and their projected impacts on service delivery or participant
outcomes...”
Processing period 
We have been experiencing processing delays and were not able to provide you with our 
decision by the due date. Consequently, we are deemed to have refused your application 
under section 15AC of the FOI Act. I sincerely apologise for the delay in releasing this 
decision to you.  
We have continued processing your request. In the interests of not causing any further 
delays, I have decided not to apply for an extension to the processing period from the Office 


of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) under section 15AC of the FOI Act to 
protect your internal review rights. However, your right to apply for an external review with 
the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner remains protected. Please see 
Attachment B for more information about your rights of review. 
Decision on access to documents 
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your 
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.  
I have decided to refuse your request for access under section 24AB of the FOI Act.  
In reaching my decision, I took the fol owing into account: 
•  your correspondence outlining the scope of your request  
•  the FOI Act 
•  the FOI Guidelines published under section 93A of the FOI Act  
•  consultation with relevant officers of the NDIA 
•  the NDIA’s operating environment and functions. 
Reasons for decision - Refuse a request for access (section 24A) 
Section 24A of the FOI Act provides that an agency may refuse a request for access to a 
document if the work involved in the processing of this request would substantially and 
unreasonably divert the resources of the NDIA from its other operations. 
 
On 26 February 2025 we contacted you by email to advise: 
 
I am writing to advise that the work involved in processing your request in its current 
form would substantial y and unreasonably divert the resources of the NDIA from its 
other operations due to its size. This is called a ‘practical refusal reason’ under 
section 24AA of the FOI Act.  
 
On this basis, I intend to refuse your request. However, before I make a final 

decision, I am writing to provide you with an opportunity to revise your request. This 
is called a ‘request consultation process’ as set out under section 24AB of the FOI 
Act. You have 14 days to respond to this notice in one of the ways set out below. 
 
We advised the reason for why we intended to refuse your request: 
 
We have conducted preliminary searches of the NDIA’s systems, using all 
reasonable search terms that could return documents relevant to your request. In 
addition, we have consulted with relevant NDIA staff who could be expected to be 
able to identify documents within the scope of the request, including staff who are 
 
2  
 


knowledgeable about how to conduct searches of the NDIA’s systems. Those 
searches indicate that the NDIA has more than 306,229 documents that may be 
relevant to your request. This outcome shows that the terms of your request do not 
provide sufficient information to allow us to identify the specific documents that you 
are seeking. 
 
On my reasonable estimate, I consider that there is more than 3,062,290 pages 

worth of material that may fall within the scope of your request as currently worded. 
At a conservative estimate of 1 minute per page, this would take an FOI officer more 
than 51,038 hours to simply review and collate the documents.   
 
The documents that are assessed as being within scope of the request wil  then need 

to be reviewed for any sensitivities and possible exemption under the FOI Act and 
scheduled, we wil  need to consider any consultations and carry these out if required, 
a decision wil  need to be made on each document, and a decision letter prepared. 
This wil  significantly increase the hours that it wil  take an FOI officer to process your 
request.   
 
As a result, I am of the view that the work involved in the processing of this request 

would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the NDIA from its other 
operations. 
 
During the 14-day consultation period, the agency did not receive a response. Consequently, 
under subsection 24AB(7), your request is now considered withdrawn. As this matter is 
deemed a decision under section 15AC of the FOI Act, I am obligated to issue a practical 
refusal rather than a withdrawal. 
 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at Attachment A
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
Yours sincerely 
 
Cooper (CHH674) 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Complaints Management & FOI Branch 
General Counsel Division 
 
 
 
 
 
3  
 

Attachment A 
Your review rights  
 
As this matter was a deemed refusal, internal review of this decision is not an option. 
However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI 
team by email xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or by post: 
 
Freedom of Information Section 
Complaints Management & FOI Branch 
General Counsel Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA ACT 2601  
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 

The FOI Act gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
  Online:  www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local cal  charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman wil  consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
  Phone:  1300 362 072 (local cal charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated. 
 
 
 
 

 
4  
 

Document Outline