Completion Report Dunalley.pdf

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024

Short Term Noise Monitoring
Program, Dunalley

11 June 2024 – 12 December 2024

Page 1
Page 1 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
Version Control
Version
Date
Comments
Sections
1.0
12 December
Initial Version
All
2024
Summary
D e p l o y m e n t   P u r p o s e
This  deployment  aims  to  capture  noise  levels  in  support  of  the  Noise  Abatement  Procedure
(NAP) trial, which commenced in June 2024. Specifically, it focuses on capturing noise levels of
arrivals using the RNP-AR approach and the longer RNAV approach to RWY 30.

D e p l o y m e n t   m o n i t o r i n g   P e r i o d
11 June 2024 – 12 December 2024

M o n i t o r i n g   D e t a i l s
Capture zone: 2.5km radius x 8,202ft (2,500m) altitude.
Noise  threshold  settings  by  time  of  day:  00:00-08:59  =  Threshold  51dB(A),  09:00-14:59  =
Threshold 54dB(A), 15:00-17:59 = Threshold 50dB(A), 18:00-23:59 = Threshold 45dB(A)

K e y   F i n d i n g s
•  Noise Correlation
50% of the aircraft from Hobart Airport, as per the focus group, generated noise events
that correlated to the aircraft.
•  Noise Daily Distribution
The  distribution  of  the  maximum  noise  levels  generated  by  aircraft  falls  within  the
following ranges:
-  46.7% within the range of 60dB(A) to 70dB(A)
-  20% greater than 70dB(A).
-  33.3% below 60dB(A).
•  Most Common aircraft
The most prevalent aircraft type during the deployment period was the BK17 aircraft.
•  Top loudest noise events
The  top  10  noise  events  for  this  deployment  originated  from  community  sources.
Additionally,  the  top  10  correlated  noise  events  were  associated  with  community
sources in addition to aircraft noise.
•  Busiest Day
The  purpose  was  to  analyze  the  day  that  had  the  most  significant  impact  on  the
community. The busiest day during the deployment period occurred on 3 July 2024.

Page 2
Page 2 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
Glossary of Terms

A
Arrivals
Background noise Level
The noise level in dB(A) that is exceeded 90% of the time. It is considered
(L90)
the background noise level of an environment.
Capture Zone
The region relative to the noise monitor that an aircraft can be within and
be able to be correlated to a noise event.
Correlated Noise Event
A  noise  event  matched  to  an  aircraft  movement  that  flew  through  the
(CNE)
capture zone.
D
Departures
The degree of data completeness achieved during the deployment period.
Data Availability
The data availability percentage factors in any monitor outages that occur.
Day
6:00am-10:00pm
dB(A)
A-weighted decibel. It is an expression of the relative loudness of sounds
as perceived by the human ear.
General Aviation
Movements  other  than  scheduled  commercial  airline  operations.  This
includes private, sports, charter and training operations.
H
Helicopter operations
LaMax
Each noise event will have a peak noise level which is referred to as the
maximum sound level in dB(A) or LaMax
Movement
An aircraft operation, such as an arrival or departure
Night
10:00 pm to 6:00 am
NMT
Noise Monitoring Terminal also referred to as the noise monitor.
A  noise  event  is  created  when  the  noise  level  exceeds  the  threshold
Noise Event
settings for a specified period.
O
Overflight i.e. an aircraft movement that flew over the area but did not arrive
or depart from the airport of concern.
The total number of correlated noise events (CNE) is divided by the total
Overall Correlation
number  of  aircraft  movements  through  the  capture  zone  to  calculate  the
Percentage
overall correlation percentage.
RWY
Runway
An  operation by  an  aircraft  that  arrives and  departs  on  a  runway  without
T
stopping or exiting the runway.  It is also known as Touch and Go.
The threshold represents the value that the noise level must surpass for a
Threshold
specified period to create a noise event.
YMHB
Hobart Airport, Tasmania

Page 3
Page 3 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 1 link to page 2 link to page 2 link to page 3 link to page 5 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 6 link to page 8 link to page 11 link to page 11 link to page 12 link to page 15 link to page 15 link to page 16 link to page 17 link to page 17 link to page 17 link to page 17 link to page 18 link to page 18 link to page 18 link to page 18 link to page 19

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
1 Purpose
The short-term noise monitoring program targeted locations in suburbs chosen by Airservices
Australia  with  consideration  for  community  feedback.  This  deployment aims  to  capture  noise
levels  in  support  of  the  Noise  Abatement  Procedure  (NAP)  trial,  which  commenced  in  June
2024. Specifically, it focuses on capturing noise levels of arrivals using the RNP-AR approach
and the longer RNAV approach to RWY 30. Furthermore, an extensive analysis was conducted
for the busiest day of the deployment period. This day was chosen for its potential to provide
significant statistical data and insight into a day that had the greatest impact on the community
during the deployment. The analysis provided details of the loudest noise events experienced
and the most prevalent aircraft operations observed.
To adequately depict the variation in flight paths, weather conditions, and operational patterns
from Hobart Airport movements during the trial, a monitoring period from  11 June 2024 to 12
December 2024 was deemed sufficient. However, the monitor will remain in place as part of the
ongoing short term monitoring program.
This short-term monitor was deployed in  Dunalley. The noise  monitoring terminal (NMT) was
positioned to capture aircraft within a three-dimensional cylinder capture zone. The zone spans
a  radius  of  2.5km  and  extends  to  8,202ft  (2,500m)  above  the  NMT  site  level  as  depicted  in
Figure 1. Considering that the focus group of aircraft operates below 5,000ft (1,524m), a ceiling
of 8,202ft (2,500m) was adopted to accommodate potential variations.
The Focus Group for this deployment consists of aircraft operating to the east of Hobart Airport
which include:
•  Fixed-wing jet aircraft arriving to runway 30 of YMHB.

Figure 1: NMT Correlation Zone

Page 5
Page 5 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 6 link to page 6

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
2 Deployment Details
The Connelly Marsh monitor was installed on 10 June 2024. Complete data is available from 11
June 2024 to 12 December 2024.

NMT ID
400
Deployment Period
11/06/2024 – 12/12/2024
Location
Imlay Street, Dunalley, Tas 7177
NMT Altitude
65ft (20m)
Capture Zone
2.5km radius x 8,202ft (2,500m) altitude
Data Availability
98%
The noise detection thresholds which have been selected:
     •        00:00-08:59 = Threshold 51dB(A)
Threshold Settings1
     •       09:00-14:59 = Threshold 54dB(A)
     •       15:00-17:59 = Threshold 50dB(A)
     •       18:00-23:59 = Threshold 45dB(A)
Table 1: NMT Details
3 Findings
3.1.
Noise Correlation Summary

The  total  number  of  aircraft  correlated  noise  events  (CNEs)  that  were  captured  by  the  noise
monitor during the 6-month deployment period is shown in Table 2 below.

Hobart Airport
Hobart Airport
All Movements2

Movements
Focus Group
Number of Movements
258
36
14
through capture zone
Number of CNE
144
22
7
Correlation Summary
55.8%
61.1%
50.0%
Table 2: Aircraft correlation rate

14.2% of all operations that passed through the capture zone were Hobart Airport movements.
All focus group movements are shown in Figure 2, below. Other operations included traffic from

1 Threshold setting procedures are explained in section 6.1.1.
2 All-movement tab accounts for operations to and from other airports (E.g. Amberley, Archerfield and Wellcamp) as
well as YBBN operations.
Page 6
Page 6 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
other airports, such as Hobart Cambridge and Edinburgh Airports.  A correlation of 50.0% was
achieved for the focus group of Hobart Airport movements.

Figure 2: All focus group tracks passing through the correlation zone

The findings obtained during the short-term deployment at Connellys Marsh are as follows:
•  Arrival runway 30 and H accounts for 38.9% and 11.1% respectively of the operations
from Hobart Airport over the noise monitor.
•  Departure runway H accounts for 22.2% of the operations from Hobart Airport over the
noise monitor.
•  Touch  and  Go  runway  30  and  H  accounts  for  5.6%  and  16.7%  respectively  of  the
operations from Hobart Airport over the noise monitor.
•  The average LaMax and highest LaMax for arrival and departure runways are detailed
in Table 3, below.

Average LaMax
Highest LaMax
Operation Type
Runway
noise dB(A)
dB(A)
Hobart Airport Arrival
30
61.6
65.8
Hobart Airport Arrival
H
73.9
78
Hobart Airport Departure
H
79.2
85.2
Hobart Airport Touch and Go
30
65.4
65.4
Hobart Airport Touch and Go
H
64.3
67.4
Table 3: Average LaMax and highest LaMax noise levels corresponding to each runway.
Page 7
Page 7 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 8 link to page 8

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
3.2.
Daily Distribution of Correlated Noise Events

A summary of the total number of correlated noise events by time of day, and the minimum to
maximum number of CNE on any day, are summarized below in Table 4.
Min
Max
Day Time Count
Night-time Count
Correlated Noise
number of
number of
(6:00am-
(10:00pm-
Event (CNE)
CNE per
CNE per
10:00pm)
6:00am)
day
day
N- Above3 50 dB(A)
19
5
1
3
(N50+4)
N- Above 60 dB(A)
13
1
0
1
(N60+4)
N- Above 70 dB(A)
3
0
0
1
(N70+4)
Table 4: Total correlated noise events during deployment period by time

Examination of the N-above distribution values in Figure 3 and Figure 4 (below) show that the
highest daytime noise levels (N70+) were recorded on 13 September 2024, 15 September 2024
and 11 December 2024. 46.7% of the maximum noise level generated by aircraft falls within a
range of 60dB(A) to 70dB(A), 33.3% of the maximum noise level generated by aircraft is less
than  60dB(A)  and  20%  of  the  maximum  noise  level  generated  by  aircraft  is  greater  than
70dB(A).

3 N-above (or Number-above) is defined as the number of noise event with a LaMax above the specified (eg.N50+)
value.
4 N50+, N60+, N70+ are expressed as number of noise events with a LaMax above 50dB(A), 60 dB(A) and 70 dB(A),
respectively.
Page 8
Page 8 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024

Figure 3: Daytime Daily N-Above Distribution Graph
Page 9
Page 9 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024

Figure 4: Nighttime Daily N-Above Distribution Graph
Page 10
Page 10 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 11

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
3.3.
Most Common Aircraft
The most common aircraft type that flew through the  zone during the deployment period is a
BK17 aircraft as shown in Table 5, below.

Hobart Airport
Operations
Correlated %
Operation Type
Arrival
3
33%
Departure
1
100%
Touch and Go
1
100%
Overflight
0
-
Table 5: BK17 correlation percentage across the deployment period

3.4.
Top 10 Correlated  Aircraft
The following table shows the top 10 average  and  maximum noise  levels of correlated noise
events (CNEs) for the deployment period from 11 June 2024 to 12 December 2024. The highest
average LaMax of 85.2 dB(A) is attributed to A139 helicopter departing from runway H, shown
in Table 6.
Aircraft
Aircraft
Airport  Operation
Total
Average
Max5
Type
Category
Code
Type
Runway
CNE
LaMax dB(A)
dB(A)
BCS3
J
YMHB
A
30
2
60.7
60.8
B712
J
YMHB
A
30
2
58.4
59.1
B738
J
YMHB
A
30
2
61.1
63.1
BK17
H
YMHB
D
H
1
58.2
58.2
B412
H
YMHB
T
H
1
67.4
67.4
BE36
P
YMHB
A
30
1
61.8
61.8
A139
H
YMHB
D
H
1
85.2
85.2
BK17
H
YMHB
A
H
1
64
64
BE20
T
YMHB
A
30
1
61.5
61.5
C208
T
YMHB
T
30
1
65.4
65.4
Table 6: Top 10 aircraft in the deployment period by total CNE
Aircraft Category: J = Jets, T = Turboprop, H = Helicopter, P = Piston. Operation Type: D =
Departure, A = Arrival, T = Touch and Go

5 Correlated noise events contaminated by community noise have not been uncorrelated, so it remains possible that
the maximum dB value should be lower, as the Maximum Lmax value in the table may be caused by community noise
rather than the aircraft. Examples shown in Figure 5.
Page 11
Page 11 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 12 link to page 12

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
3.5.
Noise Event Analysis
The audio verification process involved listening to and confirming the accuracy of the top  20
loudest (LaMax) noise events.
Table 7 outlines the top 10 noise events from all sources. The maximum noise levels (LaMax)
of the noise events for this deployment originated from community sources such as  an alarm
and dog noise.
Table 8 outlines the top 10 correlated noise events (that is, correlated with aircraft noise). The
maximum noise levels (LaMax) of correlated noise events for this deployment  originated from
other nearby local airport movements (Overflights) as well as Hobart Airport movements.
Some correlated noise events were associated with community sources in addition to aircraft.
This can be seen in the ‘noise source’ details in Table 8 and Figure 5. Consequently, there may
be a benefit in conducting  further noise monitoring in  this location to explore and confirm the
spectrum of noise levels attributed to aircraft, with the exclusion of any impact from community
noise contamination.
Future aircraft noise monitoring in the Dunalley area can achieve greater precision by:
•  Choosing a location were there’s no dog noise to minimise contamination of the aircraft
noise events.

Correlated
LaMax
Aircraft  Operation
Start Date/Time
to
Noise Source
Runway
dB(A)
Type6
Type7
Aircraft?
21/08/2024 10:46
No
108.5
Alarm
-
-
-
26/06/2024 17:41
No
87.5
Dog
-
-
-
3/07/2024 17:48
No
87.3
Dog
-
-
-
14/09/2024 18:17
No
86.9
Dog
-
-
-
14/09/2024 18:14
No
86.7
Dog
-
-
-
16/07/2024 18:04
No
86.6
Dog
-
-
-
14/06/2024 16:54
No
86.5
Dog
-
-
-
30/06/2024 11:21
No
86.5
Dog
-
-
-
17/06/2024 18:27
No
86.4
Dog
-
-
-
23/06/2024 11:07
No
86.3
Dog
-
-
-
Table 7: Top 10 loudest noise events during the deployment period by LaMax



6 Dash (-) indicates the details are not publicly available.
7 Operation types O = Overflight from Amberly Airport, Archerfield Airport, Toowoomba Airport, etc
Page 12
Page 12 of 19
OFFICIAL

link to page 13 link to page 13 link to page 13

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
Movement
LaMax
Aircraft
Operation
Start Date/Time
Airport8
Noise Source
Runway
dB(A)
Type9
Type10
Aircraft (Heli) and
15/09/2024 13:32
Hobart
85.2
A139
D
H
dog
28/06/2024 16:16
Overflight
80.8
Aircraft and dog
-
O
-
13/09/2024 16:44
Hobart
78.0
Aircraft and dog
A139
A
H
21/08/2024 11:24
Overflight
76.0
Aircraft
-
O
-
18/08/2024 10:17
Overflight
75.9
Aircraft (Heli)
BK17
O
-
9/12/2024 10:31
Overflight
75.0
Aircraft (Heli)
B412
O
-
8/09/2024 14:08
Overflight
74.1
Aircraft (Heli)
AS55
O
-
8/09/2024 14:07
Overflight
73.4
Aircraft (Heli)
R44
O
-
4/09/2024 11:53
Overflight
73.2
Aircraft (Heli)
-
O
-
12/09/2024 13:20
Overflight
72.3
Aircraft
BK17
O
-
Table 8: Top 10 loudest aircraft correlated noise events during the deployment period by
LaMax

8 Overflights refers to movements from Hobart Cambridge and Edinburgh Airports etc.
9 Dash (-) indicates the details are not publicly available
10 Operation types A = Arrival, D = Departure, O = Overflight, T = Touch and Go
Page 13
Page 13 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024










Figure 5: Top 9 correlated noise event from Table 8 graphed and analysed.
Page 14
Page 14 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
4 Busiest Day Analysis

4.1.
Discussion
The busiest day during the deployment period occurred on 3 July 2024, with a total of 30 noise
events. The noise events consisted of birds, dogs, wind and vehicle noise. There were 2 aircraft
captured passing through the zone from Hobart Airport movements, of which  50% were from
the  focus  group.  The  predominant  movement  over  the  capture  zone  was  from  jet operations
(100%).

Figure 6: Busiest day flight tracks

Page 15
Page 15 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
4.2.
Busiest Day Graph

Figure 7: Distributions of hourly L90, max CNE level and one-second noise data on the busiest day. Hourly L90 refers to background noise levels; see
Section 6.1.1 for more information. Max CNE level refers to the maximum noise level of the noise event, known as LaMax, which occurs when the aircraft
is within the capture zone of the noise monitor; see Section 6.1.2 for more information. One-second noise data refers to the sound levels that are
recorded every second by the noise monitor.
Page 16
Page 16 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
4.3.
Busiest Day Noise Levels
The loudest event on the 3 July 2024 was created by a dog, reaching a maximum noise level of
87.3  dB(A)  at  17:48:41  in  the  afternoon,  lasting  for  43  seconds.  No  aircraft  correlated  noise
events on the 3 July 2024.
5 Further Information
The following platforms provide further information on Hobart aircraft noise monitoring.
5.1.
Airservices Australia
Information on the noise and flight path monitoring system including approach to noise
monitoring and frequently asked questions:
https://www.airservicesaustralia.com/community/environment/aircraft-noise/monitoring-aircraft-
noise/
5.2.
WebTrak
Aircraft noise data is displayed from live noise monitors across Hobart, along with historical data:
https://webtrak.emsbk.com/hba3

Page 17
Page 17 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
6 Appendix
6.1.
Noise Event  Detection Details:
ISO  20906  provided  technical  guidance  in  this  short-term  noise  monitoring.  The  NMT  (i.e.,
sound level monitor) used for testing passed the Class 1 periodic calibration tests outlined in
clauses of IEC  61672-3:2013 and IEC 61260-3:2016. The placement of NMT considered the
vicinity of reflective surfaces and the height of the NMT relative to the target aircraft operations
to minimise potential unintended anomalies. The NMT height is fixed on a supporting pole and
the  captured  noise  events  were  observed  acceptable  throughout  the  deployment.  The
background noise levels were taken into account in the monitoring area, to appropriately capture
aircraft noise levels.
6 . 1 .1 .   T h r e s h o l d  S e tt i n g s
Noise monitor threshold settings are established by collecting hourly average L90 data over a
period of two to five days following installation of the noise monitor. L90 represents noise level
which  are  exceeded  90%  of  the  time.  It  is  considered  the  background  noise  level  of  an
environment. For instance, if the L90 hourly noise level reads 50dB(A), it means that for 90% of
that  hour,  the  noise  level  is  above  50dB(A).  The  threshold  is  set  close  to  the  average
L90+10dB(A).  The  addition  of  10dB(A)  effectively  filters  out  most  community  noise,  such  as
birds and animal sounds, machinery, and vehicle noises. As a result, the created noise event
will predominantly contain aircraft noise with minimal community noise.
6 . 1 .2 .   A i r c r a f t   a n d   N o i s e  E v e n t   Co r r e l a t i o n
The correlation of a noise event with an aircraft requires meeting the following conditions:
•  The aircraft passes through the defined capture zone set by the monitor as shown in
Figure 1.
•  The rise and fall time of the measured event matches a sound pattern representative of
an aircraft flyover.
•  Noise levels are greater than the specified threshold for a specified period when aircraft
flies over, this creates a noise event.
•  Maximum noise level of the noise event known as LaMax must occur while the aircraft
is within the capture zone of the noise monitor.
Aircraft that flew within the vicinity of the monitor but did not trigger a correlated noise event may
have failed to meet some of the parameters above. In other instances, this could be attributed
to the lack of air traffic control data (ATC). This occurs when aircraft do not have an operating
transponder  or  when  there  are  radar  outages.  Despite  a  noise  event  being  created  by  the
aircraft, without available ATC data, there will be no aircraft to correlate with the noise event.
Page 18
Page 18 of 19
OFFICIAL

FOI 24-91
OFFICIAL
Short Term Noise Monitoring – Dunalley, December 2024
6.2.
Calibration Check
The integrity of the noise monitor relies on regularly verifying the accuracy of the microphone
recording  levels  and  time  synchronisation  of  samples  with  radar  data.  The  microphones  are
replaced  with  laboratory  certified  microphones  every  12  months  and  electrostatic  calibration
tests are automatically performed daily to ensure data quality.
Page 19
Page 19 of 19
OFFICIAL