This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'TAB research papers on Applied Behaviour Analysis'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-0514 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
18 November 2024 
ndis.gov.au 
 
 
David Wright 
Right to Know 
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
 
 
Dear David Wright 
 
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 11 October 2024 (your correspondence), seeking 
access under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the 
National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA)
 
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your request. 
 
Scope of your request 
You have requested access to the fol owing documents: 
  “I refer to FOI 23.24 1189 which provides a list of all Technical Advisory Branch (TAB) 
research documents. Two items in the list are: 
 
1) 'The scope of Applied Behaviour Analysis' 

2) 'Reducing ABA over time' 
 
I request copies of these documents.” 

 
Extension of time 
On 22 October 2024, you agreed via email to a 30-day extension of time under section 15AA 
of the FOI Act, making 11 December 2024 the new date to provide you with a decision on 
access. 
 
Searches conducted 

The NDIA’s Technical Advice & Practice Improvement Branch conducted searches and 
located two (2) documents relevant to the scope of your request.  
 
Decision 

I am the authorised officer pursuant to section 23(1) of the FOI Act to make a decision on 
this FOI request. 
 
I have decided to: 
  •  Grant access in part to 2 documents in accordance with section 22 – Access to 
edited copies with exempt or irrelevant matter deleted; and 
•  Remove irrelevant material in accordance with section 22 of the FOI Act 
 
 
 



Section 22 – Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant material deleted 
Section 22 of the FOI Act permits an agency to prepare and provide an edited copy of a 
document where the agency has decided to refuse access to an exempt document or that to 
give access to a document would disclose information that would reasonably be regarded as 
irrelevant to the request for access. 
 
On 22 October 2024, you confirmed via email that you had no objections to surnames and 
contact details of NDIA staff being considered irrelevant to the scope of your request. 
 
I have identified irrelevant material in two (2) documents and am satisfied that it is 
reasonably practicable to remove this information and release the documents to you in 
material form. 
 
The decision in relation to each document is detailed in the schedule of documents at 
Attachment A. 
 
Rights of review 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B
 
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me 
by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Patrick (PHO293) 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Complaints Management & FOI Branch 
General Counsel Division  
National Disability Insurance Agency 
2 

Attachment A  
Schedule of Documents for FOI 24/25-0514 
 
Document 
Page 
Description 
Access Decision 
Comments 
number 
number 

1-9 
Research paper: Applied behaviour 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Irrelevant material removed under 
analysis and positive behaviour support   
section 22 of the FOI Act 
 
Exemption claimed: 
 
Date: 21/07/2022 
S22 – Irrelevant Material 
 
 

10-16 
Literature Review: Reducing Applied 
PARTIAL ACCESS 
Irrelevant material removed under 
Behaviour Analysis over time 
 
section 22 of the FOI Act 
 
Exemption claimed: 
 
Date: 03/01/2024 
S22 – Irrelevant Material 
 
3 


 
 

Attachment B 
Your review rights  
 
Internal Review 
The FOI Act gives you the right to apply for an internal review of this decision. The review 
wil  be conducted by a different person to the person who made the original decision. 
 
If you wish to seek an internal review of the decision, you must apply for the review, in 
writing, within 30 days of receipt of this letter. 
 
No particular form is required for an application for internal review, but to assist the review 
process, you should clearly outline your grounds for review (that is, the reasons why you 
disagree with the decision). Applications for internal review can be lodged by email to 
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or sent by post to: 
  Freedom of Information Section  
Complaints Management & FOI Branch  
General Counsel Division 
National Disability Insurance Agency 
GPO Box 700 
CANBERRA   ACT   2601 
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for the review, in 
writing, or by using the online merits review form available on the OAIC’s website at 
www.oaic.gov.au, within 60 days of receipt of this letter.  
 
Applications for review can be lodged with the OAIC in the following ways: 
  Online:  www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local cal  charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions 
taken by the NDIA in relation to your request. The Ombudsman wil  consult with the OAIC 
before investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
Your complaint to the OAIC can be directed to the contact details identified above. Your 
complaint to the Ombudsman can be directed to: 
  Phone:  1300 362 072 (local cal charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should be in writing and should set out the grounds on which it is considered 
that the actions taken in relation to the request should be investigated.