This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'TAB research papers on Applied Behaviour Analysis'.


FOI 24/25-0514
DOCUMENT 1
Research paper 
OFFICIAL
For Internal Use Only 
Applied behaviour analysis and positive 
behaviour support 
The content of this document is OFFICIAL. 
Please note: 
The research and literature reviews collated by our TAB Research Team are not to be 
shared external to the Branch. These are for internal TAB use only and are intended to 
assist our advisors with their reasonable and necessary decision-making. 
Delegates have access to a wide variety of comprehensive guidance material. If 
Delegates require further information on access or planning matters, they are to call the 
TAPS line for advice. 
The Research Team are unable to ensure that the information listed below provides an 
accurate & up-to-date snapshot of these matters 
Research question: What is the difference between Applied Behaviour Analysis and positive 
behaviour support? Is intensive ABA effective for managing behaviours of concern? What 
qualifications and legislative requirements are required for a practitioner to develop or 
implement a positive behaviour support programme? 
Date: 21/07/2022 
Requestor: Kim s22(1)(a)(ii)   
- irr
 
Endorsed by (EL1 or above): Naomi s22(1)(a)(ii)   
- irrelevan  
Researcher: Aaron s22(1)(a)(ii) 
 
- irrelevant ma
Cleared by: Shane s22(1)(a)(ii) - irre   
1. Contents
Applied behaviour analysis and positive behaviour support ....................................................... 1 
1.
Contents ....................................................................................................................... 1 
2.
Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 
3.
Applied behaviour analysis ........................................................................................... 2 
4.
Positive behaviour support ............................................................................................ 3 
5.
Intensive Applied Behaviour Analysis and behaviours of concern ................................ 4 
6.
Practitioner qualifications and registration requirements ............................................... 5 
6.1  Board Certified Behaviour Analysts ........................................................................... 5 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 1 of 9 
OFFICIAL 
Page 1 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
6.2  Behaviour support and the NDIS ............................................................................... 7 
7. 
References ................................................................................................................... 8 
8. 
Version control .............................................................................................................. 9 
 
2. Summary 
There is ambiguity in the way Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) and Positive Behaviour 
Support (PBS) are used to describe interventions or disciplines. ABA as a label can be used in 
wider or more narrow ways and depending on how the term is used it might encompass PBS 
as well. In the sense employed in much NDIS documentation, PBS is theoretically informed by 
ABA as an applied research program, while being distinguished from ABA as a specific 
intervention or therapy programme. 
There is moderate level evidence that intensive ABA programs reduce behaviours of concern. 
However, no information on dosage was found. 
While there are some intensive ABA programmes that can only be run by Board Certified 
Behaviour Analysts, some ABA-informed programs can be run by qualified health 
professionals (e.g Occupational Therapists, Speech Therapists) for which the programme is 
within their scope of practice. Positive behaviour support practitioners require specific 
registration through the NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission in order to provide 
behavioural assessments and behaviour support plans for NDIS participants. However, I 
cannot find any evidence that “behaviour support practitioner” or “positive behaviour support 
practitioner” are regulated terms outside of their use in the context of NDIS registered 
providers. 
3.  Applied behaviour analysis 
The definition of ABA used in the NDIA commissioned AutismCRC report Interventions for 
children on the autism spectrum: A synthesis of research evidence
 is: 
the scientific application of behavioural principles to, first, identify variables that are 
responsible for behavioural change, and second, to use these variables to improve 
socially significant behaviours (Whitehouse et al., 2020, p.31). 
This definition is derived from Cooper et al (2020), who say: 
Applied behaviour analysis is the science in which tactics derived from the principles of 
behaviour are applied systematically to improve socially significant behaviour and 
experimentation is used to identify the variables responsivle for behaviour change 
(Cooper et al., 2020, p.19). 
As both these definitions show, the practice of ABA is intended to improve socially significant 
behaviours. This is a very broad category of behaviours that can include: 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 2 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 2 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
social, language, academic, daily living, self-care, vocational, and/or recreation and 
leisure behaviours that improve the day-to-day life experience of the participants and/or 
affect their significant others (parents, teachers, peers, employers) in such a way that 
they behave more positively with and toward the participant (Cooper et al., 2020, p.16). 
For reasons of terminological clarity, we should also note that ABA is used by Cooper et al to 
refer to an applied research program. Cooper et al (2020) distinguish between ABA as a 
research discipline on the one hand, and on the other, professional practice in which insights 
from ABA are integrated into frontline services for use by participants, family, teachers or 
trained therapists. Whitehouse et al. (2020) use ABA to refer to both the applied research 
program and its application by Board Certified Behaviour Analysts. They distinguish ABA as 
applied by Board Certified Behaviour Analysts from derivative forms of behavioural 
intervention which might depend on ABA principles but diverge in some way. They cite, for 
example, Naturalistic Development Behavioural Interventions, Picture Exchange 
Communication System, Early Start Denver Model and Positive Behaviour Support. Rogers et 
al list interventions they consider a kind of intensive ABA-type therapy, including Murdoch 
Early Intervention Program, Early intensive behavioural intervention, Early start denver model, 
Comprehensive intensive early intervention and Intensive behaviour analytic treatment 
(Rogers et al, 2020). 
4.  Positive behaviour support 
The NDIS Quality and Safeguard Commission Positive Behaviour Support Capability 
Framework defines PBS as: 
the integration of the contemporary ideology of disability service provision with the 
clinical framework of applied behaviour analysis. Positive behaviour supports are 
supported by evidence encompassing strategies and methods that aim to increase the 
person’s quality of life and reduce challenging behaviour (NDIS Quality and Safeguards 
Commission, 2019, p.5). 
The idea that PBS is ABA plus “the contemporary ideology of disability” refers to Carr et al.’s 
suggestion that PBS emerged from three sources including ABA, the normalisation/inclusion 
movement and person-centred values (Carr et al, 2002). There is some question about 
whether PBS is a kind of ABA, or just informed or otherwise related to it (Whitehouse et al, 
2020). It is also not clear what the practical implications of this question are. 
Like ABA, PBS focusses on socially significant behaviours though its target behaviours are 
restricted to challenging or problematic behaviours. There is no agreed terminology used to 
describe challenging or problematic behaviours. Synonyms used include: behaviours of 
concern, challenging behaviour, behaviour that challenges, maladaptive behaviour, interfering 
behaviour, disruptive behaviour, problem behaviour and problematic behaviour (Whitehouse et 
al, 2020; Rogers et al, 2020). 
UK’s National Autism Centre defines problem behaviours as behaviour that: 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 3 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 3 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
can harm the individual or others OR result in damage to objects OR interfere with the 
expected routines in the community. Problem behaviors may include but are not 
restricted to self-injury, aggression, disruption, destruction of property, or hazardous or 
sexually inappropriate behaviors (National Autism Centre, 2015, p.39). 
UK’s National Institute of Healthcare Excellence also considers stereotypic behaviour and 
withdrawal to be challenging behaviours (NICE, 2015). Whitehouse et al. use the definition: 
Challenging behavior refers to certain behaviors that a person engages in which 
negatively affect his/her daily functioning. These behaviors are often recognized as 
being culturally abnormal and occur at such an intensity, frequency, or duration that the 
safety of the person and/or others is placed in jeopardy. Challenging behaviors may be 
related to social, academic, communicative, cognitive, vocational, or physical domains, 
may serve various functions, and should be examined systematically in order to identify 
these functions (Whitehouse et al, 2020, pp.122-123). 
While PBS targets specific behaviours, strategies to address those behaviours take account of 
“a person’s needs, their home environment and overall quality of life through assessment, 
planning and intervention” (Practice Guidance – Behaviour Support and Behaviours of 
Concern). This relates to another core feature of PBS cited by the NDIS commission: PBS 
aims to reduce and eliminate restrictive practice (NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, 
2022, Glossary). 
5.  Intensive Applied Behaviour Analysis and behaviours 
of concern 
Whitehouse et al. (2020) summarise evidence from systematic reviews which track the effect 
of behavioural techniques on challenging behaviours. In three systematic reviews including a 
variety of behavioural interventions, they note a moderate level of evidence indicating a 
positive effect on challenging behaviours. Regarding specific interventions, they note that there 
is low level evidence that Functional Communication Training and Discrete Trial training have 
a positive effect on challenging behaviours and moderate level of evidence that Early intensive 
behavioural intervention has a null effect on challenging behaviours. 
The UK’s National Autism Centre report (2015) notes that behavioural interventions can 
reduce problem behaviours for people aged 3 – 22 years old. More specifically, ABA type 
programs delivered 25-40 hours per week for 2-3 years are shown to reduce problem 
behaviours for children aged 0 – 9. More recently, a team from the US-based National 
Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice found Functional Communication Training – 
an off-shoot of ABA – has a positive effect on reducing behaviours of concern for children 3 – 
18 years. They also found Discrete Trial Training – another ABA off-shoot – can be effective at 
reducing behaviours of concern in children aged 6 – 11 years (Steinbrenner et al, 2020).  
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 4 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 4 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
However, due to the layout of both the National Autism Centre report and the Clearinghouse 
on Autism Evidence and Practice report, it is not clear from which studies they derived the 
confident assessment that ABA-type therapies can reduce problem behaviours. This is 
important as other reviews make more tentative claims. Rogers et al (2020) reviewed 20 
intensive ABA studies and found one noting reduction in behaviours of concern but results 
were not statistically significant. In their systematic review, Reichow et al (2018) considered 2 
studies which tracked problem behaviours. They found very low-quality evidence that EBEI did 
not have a statistically significant difference effect at reducing behaviours of concern 
compared to therapy as usual control. However, given the growth of autism research in the last 
5 years, currency is a problem for this review (Whitehouse et al, 2020). 
This brief summary does show some evidence for effectiveness of ABA-type therapies in 
reducing behaviours of concern. There are some inconsistencies in results and the research 
could be of higher quality. It is also worth noting that none of the reviews spoke to the dosage 
required to effect a reduction in behaviours of concern. While 25-40 hours per week is noted 
as the dosage in the National Autism Centre report, it is not clear from the evidence reviewed 
that this level of therapy is required to achieve the outcomes stated or that other therapies 
derived from ABA have this level of implementation. 
Also of note, there is evidence that other types of therapies are also effective at reducing 
behaviours of concern. For example, of 28 evidence-based practices that Steinbrenner et al 
consider, only 2 did not show some effect at reducing behaviours of concern for some age 
group of children or young adults. 
Reichow et al conclude their review by saying: 
Given the lack of high-quality, generalizable evidence to determine the effects of Early 
Intensive Behavioural Intervention (EIBI) for ASD, it is important that decisions about its 
use are made on a case-by-case basis. It is also important that providers of EIBI are 
aware of the limited quality of the current evidence and use clinical decision-making 
guidelines, such as seeking the family’s input and drawing upon prior clinical 
experience, when making recommendations to clients on the use of EIBI (Reichow et al, 
2018, p.17). 
6.  Practitioner qualifications and registration 
requirements 
6.1  Board Certified Behaviour Analysts 
ABA practitioners should be qualified, regulated and deliver services that are within the scope 
of their clinical practice. Unlike other allied health professionals in Australia, ABA practitioners 
are currently accredited internationally by the Behavior Analyst Certification Board (BACB) 
based in USA (Whitehouse et al, 2020; Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia, n.d). 
BACB provide certification for: 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 5 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 5 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
•  Registered Behavior Technician (RBT) – works under supervision of BCaBA and 
BACB 
•  Board Certified Assistant Behavior Analyst (BCaBA) – works under supervision of 
BACB 
•  Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA) – works independently and can supervise 
RBT and BCaBA (Behaviour Analysis Certification Board, n.d, Board Certified 
Behavior Analyst). 
To gain and maintain accreditation as a BACB, a practitioner needs to: 
•  complete a recognised course or equivalent professional experience 
•  pass an exam 
•  meet continuing education requirements 
•  adhere to ethics requirements 
•  recertify every 2 years (Behaviour Analysis Certification Board, n.d, Credentials). 
Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia has expressed their intention to take up regulation 
and accreditation of ABA practitioners in Australia: 
As of December 2019 the BACB announced that it wil  limit certification to a select 
number of countries. Currently, Australia is one of the countries where BACB 
certification is stil  available but the longevity of this option is unknown. This has 
highlighted the need for Australia to have its own regulatory body for behaviour analysts. 
ABA Australia saw the need of our field and felt that it was inline with our mission and 
objectives to take on this challenge and continue our efforts to disseminate safe and 
ethical practice of ABA (Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia, n.d, Professional 
Self-Regulation). 
Not all interventions which incorporate the principles or strategies of ABA are restricted to 
certified BCBAs. The figure below from Whitehouse et al (2020, p.47) describes different 
pathways by which ABA-type or associated interventions can be practiced. 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 6 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 6 of 16



FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
 
6.2  Behaviour support and the NDIS 
Specialist behaviour support is provided through a participant’s NDIS plan through the 
Improved Relationships budget using line items: 
•  Specialist Behavioural Intervention Support 
•  Behaviour Management Plan Including Training in Behaviour Management 
Strategies 
A registered specialist behaviour support practitioner must develop all functional behaviour 
assessments and Behaviour Support Plans, as positive behaviour support practice requires a 
specific skil set and appropriate safeguards (Practice Guidance – Behaviour Support and 
Behaviours of Concern). An NDIS behaviour support practitioner must be deemed suitable by 
the NDIS Quality and Safeguard Commission (NDIS Restrictive Practices and Behaviour 
Support Rules 2018, s17). To be deemed suitable the practitioner must be qualified, 
experienced and must have considered their professional development alongside the Positive 
Behaviour Support Capability Framework (NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission, 2022, 
Fact sheet: New behaviour support practitioners). 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 7 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 7 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Research paper 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
The above is required for a practitioner to provide positive behaviour support to NDIS 
participants. There may be qualified and practicing behaviour support practitioners who are not 
NDIS behaviour support practitioners. I cannot find any evidence that “behaviour support 
practitioner” or “positive behaviour support practitioner” are regulated terms outside of their 
use in the context of NDIS registered providers. 
7.  References 
Association for Behaviour Analysis Australia. (n.d). https://auaba.com.au/ 
Behavior Analysis Certification Board. (n.d). https://www.bacb.com/bcba/ 
Carr EG, Dunlap G, Horner RH, et al. (2002). Positive Behavior Support: Evolution of an 
Applied Science. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions4(1):4-16. 
doi:10.1177/109830070200400102 
Cooper, J. O., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (2020). Applied Behaviour Analysis (Vol. 3rd Ed). 
United Kingdom: Pearson 
National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 
2. https://www.nationalautismcenter.org/national-standards-project/phase-2/ 
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). (2015). Challenging behaviour and 
learning disabilities: Prevention and interventions for people with learning disabilities 
whose behaviour challenges. Retrieved from https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng11 
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission (2019). Positive behaviour support capability 
framework: For NDIS providers and behaviour support practitioners. Penrith, Australia: 
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. Available: 
https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/pbscapabilityframework 
NDIS Quality and Safeguards Commission. (2022). Fact sheet: New entry level behaviour 
support practitioners applying for suitability. 
https://www.ndiscommission.gov.au/sites/default/files/2022-07/New entry level 
behaviour support practitioners suitability.pdf  
Reichow, B., Hume, K., Barton, E. E., & Boyd, B. A. (2018). Early intensive behavioral 
intervention (EIBI) for young children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD). Cochrane 
Database of Systematic Reviews
 (5). doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009260.pub3 
Rodgers M, Marshall D, Simmonds M, Le Couteur A, Biswas M, Wright K, et al. (2020) 
Interventions based on early intensive applied behaviour analysis for autistic children: a 
systematic review and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess, 24(35). 
Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowel , S. W., Tomaszewski, B., 
Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence-
based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism. The University of 
V1.0 25-07-2022 
ABA and PBS 
Page 8 of 9  
OFFICIAL 
Page 8 of 16




FOI 24/25-0514
DOCUMENT 2
Literature Review 
OFFICIAL
For Internal Use Only 
Reducing Applied Behaviour Analysis over time 
The content of this document is OFFICIAL. 
Please note: 
The research and literature reviews collated by our TAB Research Team are not to be shared 
external to the Branch. These are for internal TAB use only and are intended to assist our 
advisors with their reasonable and necessary decision-making. 
Delegates have access to a wide variety of comprehensive guidance material. If Delegates 
require further information on access or planning matters, they are to call the TAPS line for 
advice. 
The Research Team are unable to ensure that the information listed below provides an 
accurate & up-to-date snapshot of these matters 
Research question: Is there substantial evidence that a step-down transition away from 
Applied Behaviour Analysis (ABA) therapy can provide outcomes and be of benefit? 
Date: 3/1/24 
Requestor: Star s22(1)(a)(ii) -    
Endorsed by: Naomi s22(1)(a)(ii) - irreleva  
Researcher: Stephanie s22(1)(a)(ii) 
,
- irrelevant mate  Aaron s22(1)(a)(ii) 
 
- irrelevant ma
Cleared by: Stephanie s22(1)(a)(ii) - irrelevant mat 
1. Contents
Reducing Applied Behaviour Analysis over time ........................................................................ 1 
1.
Contents ....................................................................................................................... 1 
2.
Summary ...................................................................................................................... 2 
3.
Previous TAPIB research papers .................................................................................. 2 
4.
Review of Provided Literature ....................................................................................... 2 
5.
Other sources ............................................................................................................... 2 
6.
Literature review table ................................................................................................... 4 
7.
References ................................................................................................................... 7 
Reducing ABA 
Page 1 of 7 
OFFICIAL 
Page 10 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Literature Review 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
2. Summary 
This paper considers the evidence for a step-down model of reducing frequency or intensity of 
applied behaviour analysis (ABA). No evidence was found regarding the effectiveness of a 
step-down model. One international ABA accreditation body, the Behavioral Health Center of 
Excellence, recommends a gradual reduction in hours when concluding ABA therapy. 
Five papers were attached with the research request. None of the papers directly relate to the 
efficacy of a step-down model of reducing ABA supports. 
Previous TAPIB research has found a lack of consensus regarding appropriate intensity and 
duration of ABA therapy. Recent Australian guidelines on the delivery of supports for children 
with autism note that supports should be individualised and there is no set number of hours of 
therapy which are appropriate for every child. 
3.  Previous TAPIB research papers 
Previous TAPIB research papers related to ABA include: 
•  RES 246 ABA and positive behaviour support.docx 
•  RES 292 Applied behaviour analysis for adults with ASD.docx 
RES 246 found no evidence for appropriate frequency, intensity or timeframe of ABA required 
to affect a reduction in behaviours of concern, nor any information on reducing intensity of 
support over time. 
RES 292 found lack of consensus regarding appropriate frequency, intensity or timeframe of 
ABA. The studies review in this paper emphasised that an individualised approach to 
determining frequency, intensity and timeframe of supports is required. 
4.  Review of Provided Literature 
Five papers were attached with the research request (refer to 6. Literature Review table for 
further details). None of the attached papers were directly relevant to the research question. 
None of the papers reviewed directly addressed the benefits of an extended timeframe of 
supports or the benefits of slowly reducing ABA support over time. No quality assessment was 
completed due to lack of relevance to the research question. 
5.  Other sources 
The Behavioral Health Center of Excellence (BHCE) is a private organisation that offers 
accreditation of applied behaviour analysts. They suggest fading out services gradually based 
on the needs of the client (BHCE, n.d.). However, BHCE provide no evidence on which they 
base this recommendation. 
 
Reducing ABA 
Page 2 of 7  
OFFICIAL 
Page 11 of 16


FOI 24/25-0514
Literature Review 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
Autism CRC’s recent National Guideline for supporting the learning, participation, and 
wellbeing of autistic children and their families in Australia
 (Trembath et al, 2022), makes the 
following recommendations around duration of supports: 
56 . 1 The amount and duration of support provision should be tailored to the individual 
needs of the child and family. This includes consideration of the frequency, length, and 
time of day of support sessions, and variations in support needs over time. 
56.3 Practitioners should inform parents that there is no set number of hours per week 
of practitioner delivered child-directed supports that leads to the best outcomes for all 
children. 
56 . 4 Practitioners should be aware that research evidence does not support the 
concept that supports delivered in greater amounts consistently lead to better child and 
family outcomes (Trembath et al, 2022, pp.95-96). 
The National Guideline does not discuss reducing therapy over time. 
 
 
Reducing ABA 
Page 3 of 7  
OFFICIAL 
Page 12 of 16








FOI 24/25-0514
Literature Review 
OFFICIAL 
For Internal Use Only 
7.  References 
Behavioral Health Center of Excellence. (n.d.). Suggestions for Ethically Fading Out ABA 
Services. https://www.bhcoe.org/2016/11/suggestions-ethically-fading-aba-services/ 
Camargo, S. P., Rispoli, M., Ganz, J., Hong, E. R., Davis, H., & Mason, R. (2014). A review of 
the quality of behaviorally-based intervention research to improve social interaction 
skills of children with ASD in inclusive settings. Journal of autism and developmental 
disorders
44(9), 2096–2116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-014-2060-7 
Ivy, J.W. & Schreck, K.A. (2016). The Efficacy of ABA for Individuals with Autism Across the 
Lifespan. Current Developmental Disorder Reports, 3, 57–66. 
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40474-016-0070-1 
Kadar, M., McDonald, R., & Lentin, P. (2012). Evidence-based practice in occupational therapy 
services for children with autism spectrum disorders in Victoria, Australia. Australian 
occupational therapy journal
59(4), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-
1630.2012.01015.x 
National Autism Center. (2015). Findings and conclusions: National standards project, phase 
2. https://www.nationalautismcenter.org/national-standards-project/phase-2/ 
Steinbrenner, J. R., Hume, K., Odom, S. L., Morin, K. L., Nowel , S. W., Tomaszewski, B., 
Szendrey, S., McIntyre, N. S., Yücesoy-Özkan, S., & Savage, M. N. (2020). Evidence-
based practices for children, youth, and young adults with Autism
. The University of 
North Carolina at Chapel Hil , Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute, 
National Clearinghouse on Autism Evidence and Practice Review Team. 
V0.0 XX-XX-XXXX 
Abbreviated Title 
Page 7 of 7  
OFFICIAL 
Page 16 of 16