This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Replacement Supports – guidance and document development information'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-0432 
 
 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
ndis.gov.au 
31 October 2024 
 
Clementine Saber 
 
By email:
 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
  
Dear Clementine Saber 
 
Freedom of Information request — Request consultation process 
 
Thank you for your correspondence of 2 October 2024, in which you requested access 
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act) to documents held by the National 
Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA). 
 
Scope of your request 
You have requested access to the fol owing documents: 
  “…  (1).   Al internal guidance and policy documents related to 'replacement supports'. 
Please provide a copy of each version of these documents, including both final and draft 
versions. 
 
(2).   Al  emails between NDIA staff, involved in the development or endorsement of the 

'Replacement list (DOCX 288KB)' document, where the document is discussed. Please 
include a copy of any documents attached or linked in the emails. 

 
(3).   Al  meeting briefs/papers that involve the development or endorsement of the 

'Replacement list (DOCX 288KB)' document. 
 
(4).   Al  meeting briefs/papers that involve the development or endorsement of the 

documents identified for section (1) of this request. 
 
Please include all identified documents in full. I consider all parts of a document to be 
relevant, even if they are addressing topics other than 'replacement supports'...” 

 
Internal Consultation  
On the basis of the scope, I initiated searches for documents by the NDIA’s Cyber Security 
and Resilience, Service Guidance, Policy and Parliamentary and Ministerial branches. The 
Data Team in Cyber Security and Resilience Branch advised me: 
 
•  A key-word search was performed on the NDIA’s email server, and 588 items were 
located responsive to the keywords and criteria used, this was: 
o  Emails between NDIA staff 
 
1  
 

link to page 2 link to page 2  
o  Keyword: ‘Replacement supports list’ 
o  Date range: up to 2 October 2024 
 
Service Guidance have also provided documentation they believe to be relevant to your 
scope, and I am awaiting further responses from both Policy and the Parliamentary and 
Ministerial Branches. 
 
The 588 items located may not be relevant to the scope of your request, to determine this 
would require scrutiny of the documents by an FOI Officer to assess whether they are in 
relation to the development or endorsement of the Replacement Supports List. At a 
conservative estimate of spending two minutes assessing each item, it would take an FOI 
Officer over 19 hours to simply review and collate the documents relevant to your scope.  
 
I note that the documents that are assessed as being within scope of the request would then 
need to be reviewed for any sensitivities and possible exemption under the FOI Act. I would 
also need to consider whether any further consultations were required and carry these out.  
A decision about disclosure would need to be made on each document, and a decision letter 
prepared. These steps would significantly increase the hours that it would take for an FOI 
officer to process your request. 
 
Practical refusal reason 
As a result of my enquiries, I am satisfied that the work involved in processing the request in 
its current form would substantially and unreasonably divert the resources of the Agency 
from its other operations.1  
 
I therefore intend to refuse your request on the basis of a ‘practical refusal reason’ under 
section 24AA of the FOI Act. A practical refusal reason exists if either (or both) of the 
following applies:  
  a)  the work involved in the processing of the request would substantially and 
unreasonably divert the resources of the Agency from its other operations; and/or  
 
b)  the request does not satisfy the requirement in section 15(2)(b) of the FOI Act, which 
requires an FOI applicant to provide such information concerning the document/s 
they are seeking access to, to enable the Agency to be able to identify it or them  
 
In reaching this view, I have taken account: 
 
•  the internal searches carried out by the NDIA’s Data Team in the Cyber Security and 
Resilience Branch. 
•  Consultation with the Service Guidance Branch 
 
However, before I make a final decision, I am writing to provide you with an opportunity to 
revise your request.2 This is called a ‘request consultation process’ as set out under section 
24AB of the FOI Act. 
 
1 Section 24AA of the FOI Act.   
2 Section 24AB of the FOI Act. 

 

 
Request consultation process 
In circumstances where an Agency is considering a practical refusal, it is required to 
undertake a request consultation process under section 24AB of the FOI Act. The purpose of 
this letter is to initiate that process. You now have 14 days to do one of the following: 
 
•  withdraw your request; 
•  make a revised request; or 
•  indicate that you do not wish to revise the request (in which case the current scope of 
your request wil  stand).  
 
If you do not do one of the three things listed above during the consultation period, your 
request wil  be processed on the basis of the current scope, and it is likely to be refused on 
the basis that processing it would represent a substantial and unreasonable diversion of the 
Agency’s resources.  
 
During this period, you are welcome to seek assistance to revise your request. If you revise 
your request in a way that adequately addresses the practical refusal reason outlined above, 
we wil  recommence processing it. 
 
To assist you with revising your scope, I suggest: 
 
•  Point 1 of your scope only include current internal guidance and policy documents 
related to ‘replacement supports’ replacement supports, and not every version of 
these documents. 
•  Provide a date range for points 3 and 4 of your request, noting that the Data team 
have advised that the majority of emails located were within September and October 
2024 and any scoping outside of this date range would stil  incur a practical refusal 
reason.  
•  Provide additional keyword searches that would help locate emails relevant to your 
request. 
 
Please note that the time taken to consult with you regarding the scope of your request is not 
taken into account for the purposes of calculating the timeframe for processing your request.  
 
If you wish to discuss this process, please contact me by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
If you do not contact me within this period, that is by 13 November 2024, your FOI request 
wil  be taken to have been withdrawn under subsection 24AB(7) and wil  not be dealt with 
any further. 
 
I also note you have refused a 15AA request for an extension of time, my intention is to 
apply to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner for a 15AB extension given 
the broad nature of your scope. 
 
 
 
 

 


 
Please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions. 
 
Yours sincerely 
 
Patrick (PHO293) 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer  
Complaints Management & FOI Branch 
General Counsel Division