This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'ABA step-down model'.



Our reference: FOI 24/25-0437 
GPO Box 700 
Canberra   ACT   2601 
1800 800 110 
24 December 2024 
ndis.gov.au 
David Wright  
 
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx 
Dear David Wright  
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision 
Thank you for your correspondence of 2 October 2024, in which you requested access to 
documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA), under the Freedom of 
Information Act 1982
 (FOI Act). 
 
Scope of your request  
You have requested access to the following documents: 
 
•  “I seek all information held by the NDIA since 1 January 2023 containing reference to 
ABA step-down. I am particularly interested in any documentation that: 
•  1) Describes the ABA step down model. 
•  2) Explains under what circumstances this model is or should be included in NDIS 
participant plans, or offered to participants in AAT settlement offers, and why. 
•  3) Any reasoning or rationale for why ABA supports in NDIS plans should be 'stepped 
down”. 
On 8 November 2024, we advised that we were unable to locate the documents you were 
seeking and sought to revise your request to the following:   
 
“All documents held by the Service Delivery Branch and the AAT Branch from 1 
January 2023 to 2 October 2024 that:  

1.  Describe the ABA step down model  
2.  Records the criteria used to permit inclusion of this model in a NDIS 
participant plan  
3.  Records the criteria why an ABA support would be stepped down  
4.  A record of the number of the NDIA Settlement Agreements heard at the AAT 
for matters offering the inclusion of an ABA step down”  
I confirm your email dated 8 November 2024 where you agreed to this revision. You also 
asked that point four of your request include ‘all settlement agreements offered by the NDIA 
during these matters (not just the agreements which were accepted by participants and 
finalised through a s42C agreement).’ 
 
 
 

 


Extension of time 
On 10 October 2024, you agreed to a 30-day extension of time under section 15AA of the 
FOI Act, making 1 December 2024 the new date to provide you with a decision on access. I 
note this time has lapsed and as a result we are deemed to have refused your request under 
section 15AC of the FOI Act.  
 
Despite this, I have continued to process your application. I apologise for the delay and 
confirm that you retain your right to seek external review of this decision.  
 
Search efforts   
 
Staff in the NDIA’s Service Guidance Branch and the Legal Practice and Capability Branch 
conducted searches, and no documents relating to the scope of your request were identified. 
I have set out the reasons for this outcome in Attachment A to this letter. 
 
Rights of review 
 
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at 
Attachment B

 
If you have any enquiries about this matter, please contact me by email at xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx. 
 
 
 
Lia (LML799) 
Senior Freedom of Information Officer 
Government, Risk & Legal – Complaints Management and FOI 
General Counsel Division 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2  
 

Attachment A 
Statement of Reasons 
FOI Application 24/25-0437 
___________________________________________________________________ 
 
Refused information 
I have refused access to the information you requested under section 24A of the FOI Act on 
the basis that documents containing such information are unlocatable or do not exist. 
 
Relevant law 
Under the FOI Act, a person has a right to be given access to documents of an agency. 
However, the right of access is subject to limitations, including grounds for refusal of access. 
Section 24A of the FOI Act states that an agency may refuse a request for access to a 
document if all reasonable steps have been taken to find the document and the agency is 
satisfied that the document cannot be found or does not exist.   
 
Searches for documents 
After reviewing the scope of your FOI application, I identified the need to make enquiries with 
the NDIA’s Legal Practice and Capability Branch and the Service Design Division for 
documents relevant to the scope of your request. 
 
Legal Practice and Capability Branch advised that they do not capture data relating to the ABA 
step down approach in Administrative Review Tribunal (ART as it is now known) matters. They 
only capture whether ABA is in dispute at the ART. Whilst Service Design Division advised 
that they do not give advice on ABA ‘step down’. ABA is only considered by this branch in 
terms of behavioural support funding as recommended by specialist allied health professionals 
and their proposed therapeutic plan developed with the participant.   
 
I am satisfied that all reasonable searches were conducted in accordance with section 24A of 
the FOI Act.  
 
These enquiries have revealed that the NDIA does not hold any documents that meet the 
scope of your request.  
 
Conclusion  
Based on the information I received from the Service Guidance Branch and the Legal 
Practice and Capability Branch, I consider there are reasonable grounds to be satisfied that 
documents containing the information you seek do not exist. I therefore refuse access to the 
information under section 24A of the FOI Act on the basis that the information does not exist. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Attachment B 
 
3  
 

Your review rights  
 
Internal Review  
As this matter was a deemed refusal, internal review of this decision is not an option. 
However, if you have concern with any aspect of this decision, please contact the NDIA FOI 
team by email xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx or by post:  
 
Freedom of Information Section  
Complaints Management & FOI Branch General Counsel Division  
National Disability Insurance Agency  
GPO Box 700 CANBERRA ACT 2601  
 
Review by the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner 
The FOI Act also gives you the right to apply to the Office of the Australian Information 
Commissioner (OAIC) to seek a review of this decision. 
 
If you wish to have the decision reviewed by the OAIC, you may apply for review within 60 
days of receiving this letter.  
 
You can apply to the OAIC for review in the following ways: 
 
Online: 
www.oaic.gov.au  
Post:  
GPO Box 5218, Sydney NSW 2001 
Email: 
xxxxxxxxx@xxxx.xxx.xx 
Phone: 
1300 363 992 (local call charge) 
 
Complaints to the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner or the 
Commonwealth Ombudsman 
You may complain to either the Commonwealth Ombudsman or the OAIC about actions the 
NDIA took in relation to your request. The Ombudsman will consult with the OAIC before 
investigating a complaint about the handling of an FOI request. 
 
You can make a complaint to the OAIC using the contact details identified above, or to the 
Ombudsman by: 
 
Phone: 
1300 362 072 (local call charge) 
Email:  
xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx  
 
Your complaint should set out the grounds on which you consider the OAIC or the 
Ombudsman should investigate the NDIA’s handling of your FOI request. 
 
 
4