Our reference: FOI 23/24-1127, FOI 23/24-1128, FOI 23/24-1134
GPO Box 700
Canberra ACT 2601
1800 800 110
24 July 2024
ndis.gov.au
Julie Keys
By email: xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxxxxxx.xxx.xx
Dear Julie Keys
Freedom of Information request — Notification of Decision
Thank you for your correspondence of 17 April 2024 and 23 April 2024, in which you
requested access to documents held by the National Disability Insurance Agency (NDIA),
under the
Freedom of Information Act 1982 (FOI Act).
The purpose of this letter is to provide you with a decision on your requests.
Please note, as advised in my email to you dated 13 June 2024, I have combined the
decision of FOI 23/24-1127, FOI 23/24-1128 and FOI 23/24-1134 in this instance, because
there is a clear connection between the subject matter of the requested documents for these
requests. This will enable us to address these requests for information and decision on
access effectively.
Scope of your request
FOI 23/24-1127
You have requested access to the following documents:
“…the following information:
1/ The Technical Advisory Branch compiles research on particular diagnoses
and have released some of these under previous FOI requests (namely FOI 23/24-
0467 and FOI 21/22-1232). I am looking for these sort of documents regarding the
following condition: Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS).
2/ I am also requesting a copy of any/all documents/guidance/fact sheets relating to
how the NDIA expects ME/CFS to be managed and/or treated.
I ask you to please interpret my request broadly and provide any document that fits
the general descriptions above regardless of it’s exact title...”
1
FOI 23/24-1128
You have requested access to the following documents:
“…a copy of all documents relating to how the NDIA proposes to measure functional
capacity in people with ME/CFS.”
FOI 23/24-1134
You have requested access to the following documents:
“…a copy of all documents held or used by the NDIA to determine whether or not a
person's myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME) is permanent.
The information requested includes but not be limited to: the drugs, treatments,
management regimes that the persons medical professional is expected to provide
before making the determination that the condition is permanent.”
Processing period
The original due dates for our access decision on your FOI requests above were 17 May
2024 and 23 May 2024. I sincerely apologise for the delay in releasing this combined
decision to you. We have been experiencing processing delays and were not able to provide
you with our decision by the due date. Consequently, we are deemed to have refused your
application under section 15AC of the FOI Act.
In the interests of not causing any further delays, I have decided not to apply for an
extension to the processing period from the Office of the Australian Information
Commissioner (OAIC) under section 15AC of the FOI Act to protect your internal review
rights. However, your right to apply for an external review with the OAIC remains protected.
Please see Attachment B for more information about your rights of review.
Search Efforts
The documents were identified by conducting searches for relevant documents that are
publicly available on the NDIA’s disclosure log, and by consulting with relevant NDIA staff
from Service Delivery and Service Guidance branches who could be expected to be able to
identify documents within the scope of the request.
Decision on access to documents
I am authorised to make decisions under section 23(1) of the FOI Act. My decision on your
request and the reasons for my decision are set out below.
2
I have identified 2 publicly available documents, which fall within the scope of your request.
These documents can be accessed through the following links:
•
Our Guidelines: Applying to the NDIS – This document addresses the requirements
an individual needs to meet to be eligible for the NDIS. One of these requirements is
that they may be eligible under the disability requirements if they have one or more
impairments that are likely to be permanent and this substantially impacts their ability
to do daily life activities.
Myalgic Encephalomyelitis/Chronic Fatigue Syndrome (ME/CFS) is a condition that is not
included on
List A: Conditions that are likely to meet the disability requirements and
List B:
Conditions that are likely to be permanent for common conditions that meet the NDIS
Access – disability requirements.
Furthermore, the NDIA relies on evidence of impairment provided by treating professionals
to help us work out if an individual is eligible to access the scheme. Permanency and
functional impairment are established through expert reports and evidence of impairment
provided by treating professionals.
•
Our Guidelines: Reasonable and necessary supports – contains information about
what we can fund under the NDIS based on the National Disability Insurance
Scheme Act 2013. All supports need to meet the NDIS funding criteria in these laws
before we can fund them in a NDIS plan.
Section 4 of the FOI Act states that the definition of the document does not include material
maintained for reference purposes that is otherwise publicly available. Accordingly, I have
decided that these publicly available documents do not meet the definition of a document
available under the FOI Act. As such, I have provided you with the above links that allow you
to access the documents from the NDIA’s webpage. However, I have not granted you
access to these documents under the FOI Act.
Please be advised that the documents, ‘Research – Therapy Best Practice’ and ‘Research
paper – Myalgic encephalomyelitis/Chronic fatigue syndrome’, which fall within the scope of
your FOI request, have been previously requested under FOI 21/22-0693 and FOI 23/24-
1015 respectively. These documents are publicly available on the NDIA’s disclosure log –
please see the link to the NDIA Disclosure Log below. For your convenience, I have also
attached a copy of these documents from the disclosure log.
3
FOI Disclosure log | NDIS
I have also identified 2 further documents which fall within the scope of your request.
I have decided to grant access to these 2 documents in part.
Please note, Document 1 (Research Request – Central Sensitivity Syndromes and
Functional Neurological Disorder) in the bundle is no longer in active use by Technical
Branch Advisors.
Access to edited copies with exempt or irrelevant material deleted (section 22)
I have decided that Documents 1 and 2, contain material that is exempt from disclosure
under the FOI Act.
I have also identified that Document 1 contains material that is irrelevant to your request.
The irrelevant material relates to information which is not relevant to the subject matter of
your request.
In accordance with section 22 of the FOI Act, I have considered whether it is possible to
delete the exempt and irrelevant material from the documents and have concluded that it is
reasonably practicable to do so. Accordingly, I have prepared an edited copy of the
documents with the exempt and irrelevant material removed.
Reasons for decision
Personal privacy (section 47F)
Section 47F of the FOI Act states that a document is conditionally exempt if its disclosure
under the Act would involve the unreasonable disclosure of personal information about any
person.
The term “personal information" is defined as information or an opinion about an identified
individual, or an individual who is reasonably identifiable, whether or not the information or
opinion is true and whether or not it is recorded in a material form.
I have identified material in Documents 1 and 2, which contains the names of NDIS staff that
have not previously been disclosed to you. I consider these names to be the personal
information of those staff members. I will refer to this as the information in issue.
4
In determining whether the disclosure of that information would be unreasonable, the FOI
Act requires that I take account of all the relevant factors, including:
a. the extent to which the information is well known;
b. whether the person to whom the information relates is known to be (or to have been)
associated with the matters dealt with in the document;
c. the availability of the information from publicly accessible sources; and
d. any other matters that the agency considers relevant.
Against these criteria, I take the view that:
a. it is apparent from the information that an individual is identifiable; and
b. the information referred to above is not well known or readily available from publicly
accessible sources.
I therefore conclude that it would be unreasonable to disclose publicly this personal
information and it is therefore conditionally exempt under section 47F(1) of the FOI Act.
Public interest considerations – section 47F
Under the FOI Act, I can only refuse to disclose information which is conditionally exempt if I
conclude that it would be contrary to the public interest to do so. Section 11B of the Act sets
out what I need to consider and what I must not consider when reaching my conclusion.
Factors in favour of disclosure
In favour of disclosure, I have considered the factors outlined in section 11B(3) of the FOI
Act, and I have determined that disclosure of the relevant information in Documents 1 and 2,
would promote the object of the FOI Act by providing access to documents held by the
government. In relation to the information in issue, I afford this factor moderate weight.
Factors in favour of nondisclosure
In favour of nondisclosure, I consider disclosure of the information could reasonably be
expected to affect these individual’s right to privacy by having their personal information in
the public domain. This is an important right also recognised by the
Privacy Act 1988. For
this reason, I afford significant weight to this factor favouring nondisclosure.
5
Conclusion
While there is limited public interest in the disclosure of information conditionally exempt
under section 47F of the FOI Act, the harm that would result from disclosure is that it could
reasonably be expected to affect an individuals’ right to privacy by placing their personal
information in the public domain.
I am satisfied that the factors against disclosure of the information outweigh the factors in
favour of disclosure and that, on balance, it would be contrary to the public interest to
release this information to you. Accordingly, I have decided to release the majority of the
information with the contrary to public interest information removed pursuant to section 47F
of the FOI Act.
Release of documents
The documents for release, as referred to in the Schedule of Documents at
Attachment A,
are enclosed.
Rights of review
Your rights to seek a review of my decision, or lodge a complaint, are set out at
Attachment B.
Should you have any enquiries concerning this matter, please do not hesitate to contact me
by email at
xxx@xxxx.xxx.xx.
Yours sincerely
Ramya (RMO 260)
Senior Freedom of Information Officer
Complaints Management & FOI Branch
General Counsel Division
6
Attachment A
Schedule of Documents for FOI 23/24-1127, FOI 23/24-1128, FOI 23/24-1134
Document
Page
Description
Access Decision
Comments
number
number
Research Request – Central Sensitivity
PARTIAL ACCESS
Removed the original pages 5-14,
1
1-12
Syndromes and Functional Neurological
Exemption claimed:
21-31, 33-43 and 45 of this
Disorder
s47F – personal privacy
research document, as the
content in these pages are
Date: 24 December 2019
Irrelevant material removed under
irrelevant to the subject matter of
section 22 of the FOI Act
your request.
Research Paper: Long COVID-19
PARTIAL ACCESS
2
13-26
Exemption claimed:
Date: 15 July 2022
s47F – personal privacy
7
