This is an HTML version of an attachment to the Freedom of Information request 'Documents related to FOI 23-24/072'.


Released by the Department of Finance  
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982
FOI 23-24/127 - Document 1
From:
Qui, Peter
To:
Vickers, Marc
Cc:
ICTD.Executive; FOI Requests
Subject:
RE: FOI 23-24/072 - New FOI request and seeking DM/PA nominations [SEC=OFFICIAL]
Date:
Thursday, 21 December 2023 2:42:02 PM
OFFICIAL
Hi Marc,
Happy for you to take the lead on this.
I’ll leave it to you to decide who should be the peer advise.
Regards,
Peter
From: Vickers, Marc <xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 1:42 PM
To: Qui, Peter <xxxxx.xxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Cc: ICTD.Executive <xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>; FOI Requests <xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: RE: FOI 23-24/072 - New FOI request and seeking DM/PA nominations [SEC=OFFICIAL]
OFFICIAL
Hi Peter
Can I just confirm that you want me to be the Decision maker here?
Who would you like to nominate as a peer advise?  I suggest Cathryn or Marcel.
regards
Marc Vickers
Chief Information Security Officer
Assistant Secretary, Governance and Procurement Branch, ICT Division
Culturally and Linguistically Diverse (CALD) Network Champion
Department of Finance
W: +61 2 6215 1641 | M: s22
 | E: xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx
A: 1 Canberra Avenue, FORREST, ACT 2603, AUSTRALIA
From: Qui, Peter <xxxxx.xxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 12:24 PM
To: Vickers, Marc <xxxx.xxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
1

Released by the Department of Finance  
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982
FOI 23-24/127 - Document 1
Cc: ICTD.Executive <xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>; FOI Requests <xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Subject: FW: FOI 23-24/072 - New FOI request and seeking DM/PA nominations [SEC=OFFICIAL]
 
OFFICIAL
 
Hi Marc,
 
Can you please have a look at this for me.
 
Regards,
Peter
 
From: FOI Requests <xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx> 
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2023 12:20 PM
To: Qui, Peter <xxxxx.xxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>; FOI Requests <xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>
Cc: FOI Requests <xxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>; ICTD.Executive <xxxx.xxxxxxxxx@xxxxxxx.xxx.xx>; s22
@finance.gov.au>; s22
@finance.gov.au>
Subject: FOI 23-24/072 - New FOI request and seeking DM/PA nominations [SEC=OFFICIAL]
 
OFFICIAL
 
Good afternoon Peter,
 
A new Freedom of Information (FOI) request has been received by Finance and we require you to
nominate a decision maker and peer adviser to be responsible for making an access decision on
behalf of the Department of Finance.
 
We have sent this request to ICT Division as the recent requests that are similar were assigned to
the Governance and Procurement Branch, however if you believe this is more appropriate with the
Digital ID Taskforce Division we will forward to John Shepherd.  
 
Please make your nominations by COB Friday 22nd December 2023.
 
Request
Date received:
 
20 December 2023
Decision due:  
19 December 2023
Applicant:
Ben Fairless (Right to Know website)
Documents sought:
A comprehensive list of all domain names registered under the
.gov.au second-level domain (2TLD).
Previous similar requests
22/107
 
Applicant: C Drake - A comprehensive list of all “.gov.au” domain
names accessible by Australian public.
Outcome: Refused under Section 45 – breach of confidentiality
22/85
 
Applicant: C Drake - A comprehensive list of all “.gov.au” domain
names.
Outcome: Final charges notice – with Information Commissioner for
review
Nominations (suggested by FOI team and for you to complete)
Decision maker*
 
<Marc Vickers>
Peer adviser*
 
<Name of nominated Assistant Secretary>
2

Released by the Department of Finance  
under the Freedom of Information Act 1982
FOI 23-24/127 - Document 1
*The decision maker must be an SES officer (either substantive or acting). It is recommended that the peer adviser is also
an SES officer, but this is not mandatory, as it will depend upon your team and the circumstances of the matter.
 
A copy of the request is attached.
 
Responsibilities
The FOI Team will notify you once a decision letter has been signed and any documents to be
released have been approved by the decision maker. Otherwise the responsibility sits with the
decision maker to brief up if the matter warrants it.
 
Kind regards
s22
 
 
3